Theos-Talk Archives (February 2006 Message tt00207)

Hi Daniel,

If you'd posted each post critical of ULT one time, with intervals 
of reasonable length between them, and written an article or two 
critical of them, it wouldn't be a crusade.  It you'd reposted each 
article a time or two, over long periods of time, and written three 
or four critical articles interspersed with critical articles about 
other Theosophical sects, that wouldn't quite be a crusade.  But to 
write tons of critical posts and articles and repost them zillions 
of times at nanosecond intervals, now that's a crusade.  Pardon my 
exaggeration but that's what it feels like to read your stuff when 
you go off on a chosen target.  Carlos isn't in your league, can't 
touch the hem of your garment when it comes to crusading.

Same goes for treatment of authors BTW.

Paul



--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "danielhcaldwell" 
<danielhcaldwell@...> wrote:
>
> Carlos Aveline has written a letter dated Jan 6,
> 2006 to Betty Bland, in which he writes in part:
> 
> "In time I hope the Adyar TS will come to publicly acknowledge and
> debate other mistakes it made."
> 
> Could this letter by Aveline be part of a crusade Aveline has 
against
> the Adyar TS??
> 
> If anyone criticizes the ULT and the Theosophy Co., and points out 
> their "mistakes" they are accused of "crusades" and "attacks" 
> against the ULT.
> 
> So if Mr. Aveline goes on a writing "campaign" in two Theosophical 
> magazines constantly pointing out the "mistakes" of the Adyar TS 
and 
> criticizing officials of that society, does that mean Mr. Aveline 
is 
> on a crusade against the TS Adyar, that he is "attacking" the TS 
> Adyar? Especially if he ignores similar "mistakes" in the 
> association he says he now belongs to???
> 
> Daniel
>