Theos-Talk Archives (February 2006 Message tt00543)

Bart Lidofsky wrote:
> carlosaveline cardoso aveline wrote:
>   
> > But I find Daniel's silence on the theme very significant.
> >     
> 	Yes. If he acknowledges the existence of the accusations, it shows that 
> he takes them seriously. If he is not guilty, it's a bad idea, because 
> it gives them credence. If he IS guilty, it's a bad idea, because nobody 
> will believe him anyway.
>
> 	Bart
>   
Actually,  Daniel already addressed  this issue.  See

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/26960

Perhaps he thinks that answer was sufficient.

What I find more intriguing than his decision to be silent on the "Dave 
Green" issue is his decision to fall completely silent on all the issues 
he holds near and dear.  He has not even put out his usual offering of 
recommended readings and such.   I have  never known Daniel to back so 
completely away from a "good fight" as he would call it.   Hopefully, no 
misfortune has befallen him such that he is unable to respond here at 
theos-talk at this time.  
Then again,  perhaps when Daniel disappears  he does reappear as some 
other character to grace our stage yet again ... even now.  I am 
reminded of my Grandfather's sage advice, "Son, don't believe anything 
you hear and believe only half of what you see."



peace,


bill