Theos-Talk Archives (March 2006 Message tt00706)

I see what you mean about the squeezing.  Here are the pertinent lines 
from the 4 messages.

----

*X-Originating-IP: 66.94.237.41*
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0
X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 4.227.160.7
*From: "krsanna" <timestar@...>*

----
*X-Originating-IP: 66.94.237.38*
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:7:0:0
X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 69.9.23.244
*From: "danielhcaldwell" <danielhcaldwell@...>*

----
*X-Originating-IP: 66.94.237.35*
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0
X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 150.131.77.108
*From: "krsanna" <timestar@...>*

----
*X-Originating-IP: 66.94.237.44*
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0
X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 69.9.23.244
*From: "danielhcaldwell" <danielhcaldwell@...>*
----

The "danielcaldwell messages were received in January of this year.  The "krsanna" messages
were received in the past few days.


I do not presume to know how you and Daniel share a nearly identical originating IP.  I do not
even know if that is significant in the world of cyberspace and internet communications.  I 
simply found it interesting.


Perhaps you can explain, if you think it worthwhile.


bill



krsanna wrote:
> Bill -- Squeezing the addresses together makes them hard to 
> identify.  I believe variations in the last two digits occurs with 
> dynamic IP addresses, where a larger provider has a block of 
> addresses.  This is in contrast to static addresses that are fixed.  
> At least two of the addresses look like mine.  Let me know what you 
> figure out.  
> Krsanna
>
>
>
>   
>