Theos-Talk Archives (July 2006 Message tt00108)

Daniel,


You should circulate false dollars for people to be able to decide for  themselves which bills are real, which false... 

I am sure the FBI will understand.

Best regards,  Carlos. 



De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Cópia:

Data:Thu, 06 Jul 2006 20:01:13 -0000

Assunto:Theos-World Carlos on: "LACK OF DECISION"

> Carlos,
> 
> You write:
> 
> ===================================================
> Daniel,
> I fail to see your point.
> You should get to a conclusion as to HPB. 
> 
> If you think she was a fraud, you should have the moral courage to 
> say so publically. And you should consider the possibility of 
> dedicating your efforts to something more authentic and worthwhile 
> than her Theosophy. 
> Why loose time with fraudulent people and their writings? 
> 
> On the other hand, if you have the necessary courage to conclude -- 
> based on the available evidence -- that HPB was indeed a decent and 
> honest woman, then you should stop circulating these shameful 
> slanders against her. 
> ===================================================
> 
> Carlos,
> 
> I want readers to make up THEIR OWN MINDS concerning
> what the Coulombs/Hodgson say. 
> 
> It looks like both you and I have made up our own minds and it looks 
> like we both agree as to the "truthfulness/falsity" of what the 
> Coulombs say.
> 
> In my book, I warn the reader about the Coulomb material but
> how can they make up their own minds if they do not read at least
> some of the material?
> 
> Since I quoted in my book defenders and supporters of HPB writing
> about these Coulomb/Hodgson charges and even making comments
> about some of the charges, doesn't it make sense to quote at
> least some of the Coulomb/Hodgson material so the reader can
> see what some of the charges were, the context, etc.??
> 
> You seem SO AFRAID to let readers read for themselves, think
> for themselves, and come to their own conclusions...!!!
> 
> If some of the readers of my book come to the conclusion that
> what the Coulombs and Hodgson say is true, then so be it.
> 
> I certainly would DISagree with them on that point and if they
> contacted me I would try to show them why that conclusion is wrong,
> at least in my opinion.
> 
> But these readers have A RIGHT to read the material, think about it
> and come to whatever conclusion they do REGARDLESS of what you or I
> may think about it.
> 
> And I know a number of persons who have read the Coulomb book and
> the Hodgson report in their entirety and believe that Mme. Blavatsky
> was a fraud.
> 
> I don't agree with their conclusions and I have from time to time
> tried to discuss with them why I think they are wrong, but these
> people ARE ENTITLED to their own opinions and conclusions regardless
> of what I may think or what you believe is true.
> 
> It is too bad that you seem compelled to see me as the enemy but
> that is apparently your perception and you are entitled to it.
> 
> But I hope that at least some of the readers on this forum will see
> through the smoke screen of what your write. If not, too bad
> because I cannot do other people's thinking for them. I have enough
> of a problem trying to do my own thinking!!!
> 
> Daniel
> http://hpb.cc
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam Inteligente Terra.
> Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?+_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1152216370.442461.24153.alcuta.terra.com.br,5951,Des15,Des15
> 
> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 06/07/2006 / Versão: 4.4.00/4801
> Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]