Theos-Talk Archives (July 2006 Message tt00532)

I ask readers to think about what Carlos Aveline wrote:

"Daniel Caldwell's gossipy view of the history is but a poison."

Now I ask, what caused Carlos to write this?

As far as I can tell, I simply stated in a posting
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/34775>
certain claims made by Robert Crosbie and gave a link
<http://blavatskyarchives.com/stokescrosbie.htm>
to Crosbie's own words.

Is Carlos in effect saying that Mr. Crosbie's own
words are "gossipy"?

But notice that Carlos does NOT tell his readers why
MY [??] "gossipy view" is "but a poison".

I for one would be interested to know why my so-called
"gossipy view" is "a poison".

Vague, generalized statements such as the above by Carlos are not
helpful and I assume simply serve as a means of distracting
readers from considering the actual subject matter presented...for 
example Mr. Crosbie's own claims....

Daniel
http://hpb.cc