Theos-Talk Archives (September 2006 Message tt00292)

Agreed
Cass
ps. Daniel would you mind resending me the posting on the various Indian schools of though as I have inadvertenly deleted it. 
Many thanks
Cass

danielhcaldwell <danielhcaldwell@yahoo.com> wrote:                                  Carlos,
 
 You write:
 
 -------------------------------------------------------
 Contact is available -- through one's own Monad and Sixth Principle. 
 It is not visual or verbal. It is not "personal". Realizing this, 
 common sense prevails.
 -------------------------------------------------------
 
 But Carlos, I would suggest that neither you or I know for certain!
 
 Who are we to dictate to the Masters how they might communicate
 with various individuals???
 
 I agree it may be that for the most part "through one's own Monad 
 and Sixth Principle."
 
 But sometimes depending on the circumstances or the individual, they 
 may communicate in a very definite visual or verbal way.
 
 I don't think we can know or dictate what is the truth in this 
 matter.
 
 I personally would for the most part disregard any verbal or visual 
 supposed communication from them.  Our subconscious minds are so 
 good at projecting illusions! 
 
 But on another  personal note, I find their portraits as painted in 
 1884 as very beautiful, inspiring and uplifting. 
 
 But do we really need to be in verbal communication with the 
 Masters?  We have in the original Blavatsky/Mahatmic corpus of 
 writings more than enough teachings, advice, inspiration, etc., that 
 it may be somewhat presumptuous to think that they would communicate 
 with us on a personal level.
 
 But I don't think we can lay down hard and fast rules as to how the 
 Masters might choose to communicate with some individuals.
 
 Daniel
 http://hpb.cc
 
 
     
                       

 		
---------------------------------
Get your email and more, right on the  new Yahoo.com 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]