Theos-Talk Archives (October 2006 Message tt00023)

Re More Concentration-Letter
  
Dan writes: <"At this point in time, 
I am inclined to believe it was NOT 
Julia who "transmitted" this KH letter.  
That in fact, it was either Judge or HPB.  
Certain things even lead me to speculate 
that it was transmitted thru HPB">
  
   Well, according to the information 
you provide and the 1888 letter to Olcott, 
and if this letter is referred to by 
ver Planck/Keightly before this time - 
if anyone else but HPB wrote it down, then 
it has to be a phoney letter.... because 
the teacher said he had used no one else....
  
<Master K.H. in his August 1888 "S.S. Shannon" 
letter to Colonel Henry Olcott wrote:
  
"Since 1885 I have not written, nor 
caused to be written save thro'her [HPB's] 
agency, direct or remote, a letter or 
line to anybody in Europe or America, 
nor communicated orally with, or thro' 
any third party...."
  
    Dan writes:  <"This specific KH letter 
dates from 1888-1889-1890 when H.P. 
Blavatsky was STILL alive.">  
  
     Now if the "concentration-letter" 
is referred to before August, 1888, then 
it either HAS to be through Blavatsky, or 
it HAS to be phoney according to this 
teacher letter to Olcott.  Actually, if 
it was published in latter 1888 in the 
Path, it would have been "received" probably 
at least a month prior to that, or much more.  
If ver Planck thought she was getting 
visits every night from HPB, she was 
certainly capable of believing she was 
getting letters also.
  
     Also, these letters don't necessarily 
have to "come through" anyone...  According 
to certain magnetic influences and the 
like, I suppose, and don't understand, they 
apparently can be precipitated without 
any chela being present on site.  At 
least that seems the case with many - 
like the Olcott letter on a ship while 
at sea, and the 1900 letter.  Maybe some 
person present has to have the necessary 
magnetism, chela or not.
  
   Dan writes:  <"I have no idea what 
Jake is trying to say or convey or prove 
when he brings up Google and all of 
the "10s of thousands of false purported 
teacher-statements".">  
  
   Well, heck.... its obviously in 
reference to the HPB quote you have 
used probably half-a-dozen times about 
calling teacher letters suspect.  They 
certainly are suspect now! if one sees 
the thousands of supposed teacher-communications.
  
     As to why HPB didn't say anything 
about the concentration-letter if she 
saw it referred to in the Path.  I don't 
know.  But in speculation - which is 
all you can do if there is insufficient 
evidence - maybe it was a special case 
where she didn't want to influence ver 
Planck and Judge, but had to let them 
make their own determinations and discoveries.  
'A different teacher perhaps and source, 
not Blavatsky's.  Judge, early on, wasn't 
even written to by Blavatsky for years.
  
              - jake j.
--------------
  
 

 				
---------------------------------
Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small Business.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]