Theos-Talk Archives (November 2006 Message tt00174)

Let me add. In ML, it was mentioned that the real secrets cannot be put in
writing otherwise a manual like grammer can be written and published for
everyone to read and understand.  It may be a good idea to keep this in mind
when we read about esoteric matters.

mkr

On 11/3/06, carlosaveline <carlosaveline@terra.com.br> wrote:
>
> Friends,
>
>
> One may find some "HPB esoteric papers" in the Internet these days.
>
> Yet there are some  keys to the reading and understanding of Esoteric
> Papers.
>
> Keeping these papers  "secret" or otherwise is something which belongs but
> to the physical level.
>
> Such keys to their real reading refer to the viewpoint and level of
> consciousness -- state of mind, if you prefer -- from which the reader will
> approach them. Without the Keys,  they make no sense or are read at a level
> where the real message is not understood at all.
>
> This viewpoint is not at any internet website, but it can be produced
> within oneself through years of sincere work along the lines of
> self-knowledge and self-transformation.
>
> H. P. Blavatksy writes that the SD also has to be understood from  keys or
> viewpoints, vibration rates, whatever you call it.
>
> The same happens with the so-called Esoteric (now in part "Exoteric")
> Papers of HPB.
>
> She wrote that about the texts by Philo of Alexandria -- in "Isis".
>
> The Talmudists state the same about the Talmud. And so on.
>
> That's why the Secret Doctrine is called Secret; why  the same Doctrine is
> called "of the Heart", why  its "voice" is called "of the Silence" -- and so
> on. Because it is NOT in the WORDS.
>
> The New Testament talks about the need to go beyond dead letter and to
> attain to the Spirit.
>
> The dead letter of the HPB's "esoteric papers" is published indeed. So
> what?
>
> There is an unwritten transmission which is NOT in the written words,
> as  Zen people, and Jewish tsadiks, Sufi students and Occultists know very
> well. This cannot be put in words, or in the internet; but the open heart
> may guess it.
>
> We have to popularize "a [practical] knowledge of Theosophy". That's what
> matters.
>
>
> Best regards, Carlos.
>
>
> oooooooooooooooooo
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]