Re: "Le Droit" Versus Adyar
Nov 08, 2006 06:03 PM
by Carl Ek
Carlos,
I don't think HPB was wrong, not at al (and I, and very few others
as well, can't remember everything she wrote), I agree with here.
Simple because "Modern Masonry" and "Ancient Freemasonry" (the two
terms of the two main branches of today's, as well as during
Blavatsky's time, Masonry), are not the same thing. If one studies
the structures of Masonry, one will find a very distinct border,
going straight thru the whole Masonic Movement (separating
individual from individual, the Modern is in majority in the US, but
in Europe it is impossible, for my anyway, to say which category
which is in majority). This border separates those who know, respect
and search the true origin and Spirit of Freemasonry, from those who
see the Masonic lodge (clubs) as a "dinner club" (HPB said that
those do not disserve, and should not, to be promoted over the third
degree, MM) and believe in the myth of 1717 and middle age cathedral
builders.
Your words "will not act in Masonic organizations", am I not
agreeing with at al. Every Theosophist that also is a Freemason has
an obligation to enlighten one's Masonic Brethren about the True,
just as Cagliostro did. In the archives of the Grand Lodge in
Copenhagen of the "Danish Order of Freemasons" (the Swedish Rite) is
an very interesting document of on lodge meeting, where Cagliostro
was present and held an lecture about reincarnation on the lights of
the Masonic symbols. Every Theosophist which also is a Freemason
should act, as good as one can, in the footsteps of Cagliostro.
About the relation between TS Adyar and "Le Droit Humain". That "Le
Droit Humain" was a part of the Adyar-Movement was a Maya with in
the TS Adyar, and not with in the "Le Droit Humain". I will no say
that my "your personal experience is", is so very, "limited". My
first contact with a member (she was traditional Co-Masonic, and an
Ancient Freemason) of the Supreme Counsel in Paris was in 1998 (this
was before the leadbearerian rite was forbidden), and she described
very well the internal conflicts, and relations between the two
divisions. It was more or less two orders, working under the same
name. In many cities, were two "Le Droit Humain" lodges (one
traditional and one leadbeaterian) present, with, often, no contacts
at al.
That the leadbeaterians left the "Le Droit Humain" was good for
both. So agree with you, it was an "unhealthy mixture".
Carl
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline"
<carlosaveline@...> wrote:
>
> Carl,
>
> The words you quote -- "modern disciples of the Masters have
nothing to do with modern Masonry" -- were written by HPB, and not
by me. You may think HPB was wrong, etc.
>
> As I understand these words, though, HPB means that disciples will
not mix own their activities with any masonic or ritualistic
actions/organizations. And will not act in masonic organizations.
>
> They will study masonic ideals, philosophy and tradition in
abstract, like HPB did. She wrote a lot about Masonry, yet she did
not want any confusion between the masonic movement and the
theosophical movement.
>
> If you had the actual experience I and hundreds of people have
with the Adyar theosophical movement (not talking about Brazil
only) you would not say that there was never confusion and wrong
intermixing between "Le Droit Humain" and the Adyar TS. If you
think different, that is your right. But if you insist, I will
possibly conclude that your personal experience is limited -- or
else your view one-sided. And that is for a reason.
>
> The event of actual separation between "Adyar TS & Masonry"
from "Le Droit Humain" was most painful for both parties;
traumatic for many people; involved acute power struggle, and was
international.
>
> I respect your hurt feelings, but facts are facts. There was an
unhealthy mixture before separation and "divorce" -- hence the pain
and trauma involved.
>
> Carlos.
>
> De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
>
> Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
>
> Cópia:
>
> Data:Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:35:02 -0000
>
> Assunto:[Spam] Theos-World Re: CARL, ON WHAT I SAY
>
> > Carlos,
> > If "modern disciples of the Masters "have nothing to do with
modern
> > Masonry". Can you then tell me way Western Masonry is an
obligatory
> > study for all Eastern Chelas?
> >
> > And please stop claim that "Le Droit Humain" has been a part of
the
> > Theosophical Movement, or TS Adyar or what ever. It has never,
and
> > never will be that.
> >
> > And to find HPB students in the "Le Droit Humain" today is
possible,
> > hence the leadbeaterians are out.
> >
> > I was for many years' member in a lodge, working partly under
the
> > Grand Lodge of Stockholm. I left hence the Swedish Order of
> > Freemasonry and the Swedish Rite is infiltrated by Lutheran
priest.
> > On horrifying example of this is that the priests don't have to
> > where white gloves, hence they as priests can't have been
involved
> > in the "murder of Hiram Abiff" (a Masonic symbol, for the none
> > masons). Nonsense! So I went some where else.
> >
> > Carl
> >
> > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Carl,
> > >
> > > I was talking, and am talking, about the fact that HPB was not
> > initiated in any masonic or kind-of-masonic organization; I was
> > talking about the fact that
> > > she received masonic diplomas (at least two) as a homage, and
not
> > because she had been initiated in any Rite or masonic
organization;
> > I was talking about the fact that according to HPB, modern
disciples
> > of the Masters "have nothing to do with modern Masonry", as you
can
> > see, with all due bibliographical references, in an earlier
message
> > from me, today. (I can repeat the message if you want.)
> > >
> > > This is not meant as an offence to anyone's feelings.
> > >
> > > I respect "Le Droit Humain" and other masonic orders, although
I
> > consider that they are not part of the theosophical movement as
> > designed by the Masters and HPB.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards, Carlos.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > > Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > > Cópia:
> > >
> > > Data:Tue, 07 Nov 2006 05:19:14 -0000
> > >
> > > Assunto:[Spam] Theos-World Re: Words and Words
> > >
> > > > Carlos,
> > > >
> > > > No, that wasn't clear!
> > > >
> > > > Carl
> > > >
> > > > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline"
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Carl,
> > > > >
> > > > > I was not talking about the word "Adoption".
> > > > >
> > > > > Wasn't it clear?
> > > > >
> > > > > Carlos.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > >
> > > > > Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > >
> > > > > Cópia:
> > > > >
> > > > > Data:Mon, 06 Nov 2006 14:05:15 -0000
> > > > >
> > > > > Assunto:[Spam] Theos-World Re: HPB and Her Mason Friends
> > > > >
> > > > > > I see that I have to say it again;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Masonic term "Adoption" DOES NOT mean honorary, it
means
> > > > that it
> > > > > > is female Masonry. The origin of the term is from
France, in
> > the
> > > > > > 1770', when Masonic lodge was founded for women, or
mixed.
> > Hence
> > > > > > women can't (from their point of view, and then of
course)
> > rule
> > > > a
> > > > > > lodge them self, these female lodges was "Adopted" by a
male
> > > > lodge,
> > > > > > and the Lodge Mistress reported to the Worshipful Master
of
> > the
> > > > male
> > > > > > lodge, that had adopted the female lodge.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A Masonic term, is a Masonic term, and what the civil
> > society,
> > > > use
> > > > > > the same word, dose not matter.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Carl
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline"
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Carl,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We both knew and still know what is "Adoption".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > HPB did not go to "Masonic meetings".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So it was a homage, an honorary title, if I may use my
own
> > > > words.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can use your words for the same fact.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yet she was not an active Mason, only a "honorary"
one.
> > She
> > > > had
> > > > > > friends there.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Carlos.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cópia:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Data:Mon, 06 Nov 2006 02:27:25 -0000
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Assunto:[Spam] Theos-World Re: CARL NOW DOES CLARIFY!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Carlos,
> > > > > > > > You wrote: "So there is NOTHING about HPB being an
> > active
> > > > member
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > any ritualistic
> > > > > > > > Organizations in the 19 century."
> > > > > > > > Don't twist it around now, for the discussion was if
she
> > > > ever
> > > > > > was an
> > > > > > > > active mason or not, and on that my answer is that I
> > have
> > > > never
> > > > > > seen
> > > > > > > > that. And if she participates in any Masonic lodge
> > meeting,
> > > > I
> > > > > > don't
> > > > > > > > know. But if she come, they surely hade let her in.
> > > > > > > > But she was a member of more then two Masonic
orders,
> > and
> > > > one of
> > > > > > > > this the A.P.R.M. was honorary. The others (inkl.
Sat
> > Bhai),
> > > > > > read
> > > > > > > > for you self:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "My Masonic experience ? if you will so term
membership
> > in
> > > > > > several
> > > > > > > > Eastern Masonic fraternities and esoteric
brotherhoods ?
> > is
> > > > > > confined
> > > > > > > > to the Orient." (HPB Speaks, vol. I p. 31)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You wrote: "As to her 'honorary membership' -- take
a
> > look
> > > > at
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > facsimile copy of HPB's masonic "Adoption" diploma
> > in "HPB
> > > > > > Speaks".
> > > > > > > > That is honorary, no doubt."
> > > > > > > > The Masonic term "Adoption" DOES NOT mean honorary,
it
> > means
> > > > > > that it
> > > > > > > > is female Masonry. The origin of the term is from
> > France, in
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > 1770', when Masonic lodge was founded for women, or
> > mixed.
> > > > Hence
> > > > > > > > women can't (from their point of view, and then of
> > course)
> > > > rule
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > lodge them self, these female lodges was "Adopted"
by a
> > male
> > > > > > lodge,
> > > > > > > > and the Lodge Mistress reported to the Worshipful
Master
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > male
> > > > > > > > lodge, that had adopted the female lodge.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And plus the Theosophical Society and The Esoteric
> > School of
> > > > > > > > Theosophy, of course. The rituals of TS (written by
> > Olcott
> > > > 1876)
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > EST (based on the old TS-rituals, and rewritten by
HPB
> > 1888)
> > > > > > were
> > > > > > > > inspired of Masonic rituals. In Sweden (in the three
> > > > society,
> > > > > > Point
> > > > > > > > Loma, Adyar and the Independent Swedish TS), this
> > rituals
> > > > was
> > > > > > used
> > > > > > > > in till after the 1900. I have seen a photograph
from a
> > > > Pasadena
> > > > > > EST-
> > > > > > > > meeting in Helsingborg from the early 1950's. They
were
> > al
> > > > > > dressed
> > > > > > > > up in dress cotes, wearing the EST-jewels (stars, as
> > > > designed by
> > > > > > KT,
> > > > > > > > or on her order) and the lodge room was lighted with
> > > > candelabras
> > > > > > > > (there is no doute what it was; hence one clearly
can
> > see
> > > > HPB's,
> > > > > > M's
> > > > > > > > and KH's portraits in the background and one of the
> > > > participants
> > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > know in person very well). In 2003, we arrange the
> > > > > > > > last "celebration" of the White Lotus Day in
Gothenburg,
> > > > after a
> > > > > > > > ritual written 1889 by Dr Gustaf Zander, President-
> > Founder
> > > > of
> > > > > > the TS
> > > > > > > > in Sweden, Judge's Agent for EST in Scandinavia,
> > disciple of
> > > > > > Jasper
> > > > > > > > Niemand and corresponding with Judge in till 1896.
This
> > was
> > > > > > arranged
> > > > > > > > together by Pasadena TS and the Swedish TS. 68
people
> > were
> > > > > > present,
> > > > > > > > and I was in chair.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Don't say that there has not been or are no rituals
in
> > the
> > > > TM.
> > > > > > They
> > > > > > > > are there, and have been there from the very
beginning
> > > > (1876).
> > > > > > If
> > > > > > > > branches want to work with them, they are free to do
so,
> > if
> > > > they
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > want to, when don't have to. It is the same in
Adyar,
> > today,
> > > > to.
> > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > know Adyar lodges that still have a ritual (not the
same
> > as
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > original, as far as I know) to initiate new members.
I
> > was
> > > > > > present
> > > > > > > > in one in 1994 (The Wesak Lodge in Sweden).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Carl
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline"
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Carl,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So there is NOTHING about HPB being an active
member
> > of
> > > > any
> > > > > > > > ritualistic organizations in the 19 century. (See
> > below).
> > > > > > > > Excellent, my brother. Facts are facts and this
absence
> > of
> > > > > > > > evidences is a FACT, for sure.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > As to her 'honorary membership' -- take a look at
the
> > > > > > facsimile
> > > > > > > > copy of HPB's masonic "Adoption" diploma in "HPB
> > Speaks".
> > > > That
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > honorary, no doubt.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Note that HPB denounced in most vehement terms
> > > > the "ceremonial
> > > > > > > > magic" as a practice for the 19th century.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > She probably could smelll the uselessness, nay,
the
> > > > > > harmfulness of
> > > > > > > > it in the Aquarius Age...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regards, Carlos.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cópia:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Data:Sat, 04 Nov 2006 14:51:39 -0000
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Assunto:[Spam] Theos-World Re: HPB and Sat B'hai
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Carlos,
> > > > > > > > > > My answers are in capital letters.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Sorry, but whare is the desmonstration that HPB
was
> > ever
> > > > > > active
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > such a a
> > > > > > > > > > movement? NOTHING, AND THERE IS NOTHING ABOUT
> > > > ANY "HONORARY
> > > > > > > > MEMBERS"
> > > > > > > > > > EITHER.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Did she write about that in a letter not forged?
> > What
> > > > about
> > > > > > > > > > originals of her
> > > > > > > > > > statement that she belonged to it? ASK TILLETT,
AND
> > THE
> > > > > > > > RESEARCHERS
> > > > > > > > > > IN QC IN LONDON.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Did any of her contemporaries (loyal
theosophists)
> > write
> > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > such
> > > > > > > > > > an active
> > > > > > > > > > membership? NO< ANF I HAVE NEVER SAID THAT
EITHER.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > What did Olcott tie about this? SORRY, BUT I
DON"T
> > > > > > UNDERSTAND
> > > > > > > > THIS
> > > > > > > > > > QUESTION. SAY IT IN OUTHER WORDS, PLEASE.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > And then, Boris de Zirkoff? S. Cranston? Did
Boris
> > > > include
> > > > > > > > anything
> > > > > > > > > > about that
> > > > > > > > > > in HPB's Collected Writings? WAY DO ASK THAT TO
ME?
> > > > SORRY,
> > > > > > THEY
> > > > > > > > ARE
> > > > > > > > > > BOTH DEAD, IF THEY WASEN'T, YOU SHOULD HAVE
ASKED
> > THEM
> > > > THAT,
> > > > > > AND
> > > > > > > > NOT
> > > > > > > > > > ME. I THINK THERE IS A FOTNOT IN BCW, BUT I HAVE
TO
> > LOOK
> > > > TO
> > > > > > BE
> > > > > > > > SURE.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I am talking about good old theosophical
sources.
> > (You
> > > > know
> > > > > > > > there is
> > > > > > > > > > a lot of
> > > > > > > > > > people talking to HPB and the Masters around the
> > corner
> > > > or
> > > > > > > > useing
> > > > > > > > > > their names
> > > > > > > > > > for their own purposes.) YES, I KNOW THAT VERY
MUCH.
> > BUT
> > > > THE
> > > > > > > > FACT
> > > > > > > > > > THAT THERE ARE THINGS ABOUT HBP AND THE MASTER,
THAT
> > YOU
> > > > > > DON'T
> > > > > > > > > > HAPPENED TO LIKE, DOESEN'T MAKE THEM UNTRUE OR
FALSE.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Carl
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In theos-
talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline"
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Carl,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, but whare is the desmonstration that
HPB
> > was
> > > > ever
> > > > > > > > active in
> > > > > > > > > > such a a movement?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Did she write about that in a letter not
forged?
> > What
> > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > > > originals of her statement that she belonged to
it?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Did any of her contemporaries (loyal
theosophists)
> > > > write
> > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > > > such an active membership?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > What did Olcott tie about this?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > And then, Boris de Zirkoff? S. Cranston? Did
Boris
> > > > include
> > > > > > > > > > anything about that in HPB's Collected Writings?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I am talking about good old theosophical
sources.
> > (You
> > > > > > know
> > > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > > is a lot of people talking to HPB and the
Masters
> > around
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > corner
> > > > > > > > > > or useing their names for their own purposes.)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > In bona fide, Carlos.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Cópia:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Data:Sat, 04 Nov 2006 13:26:42 -0000
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Assunto:[Spam] Theos-World Re: HPB and Sat
B'hai
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Carlos,
> > > > > > > > > > > > See the "Sat Bhai Code" below. Do you see
> > anything
> > > > about
> > > > > > > > > > > > any "honorary member" there?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Carl
> > > > > > > > > > > >
______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > CODE
> > > > > > > > > > > > OF
> > > > > > > > > > > > THE ROYAL ORIENTAL ORDER
> > > > > > > > > > > > OF
> > > > > > > > > > > > SIKHA (APEX) AND THE SAT BHAI
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > RAHU
> > > > > > > > > > > > REPRESENTATIVE OF ARTIRAM
> > > > > > > > > > > > AND OF
> > > > > > > > > > > > THE SAT BHAI OF PRAG
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > THE CODE OF SIKHA (APEX), &c.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > (1) This Oriental Order embraces the Perfect
> > > > Terrestrial
> > > > > > > > Zone of
> > > > > > > > > > 360
> > > > > > > > > > > > degrees, and the Mystic Zone inclusive of
all
> > > > others,
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > occupies
> > > > > > > > > > > > the highest point of the Masonic fabric.
> > Therefore,
> > > > > > while
> > > > > > > > under
> > > > > > > > > > its
> > > > > > > > > > > > benign influence, justice is done to all,
and
> > > > > > innovations
> > > > > > > > > > > > inconsistent with the grand principles of
> > harmony,
> > > > and a
> > > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > > > > > > equality, regulated to the varied
circumstances
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > social
> > > > > > > > > > scale,
> > > > > > > > > > > > are righteously condemned.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (2) This Paramount Order is divided into
two,
> > > > namely,
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > Sikha
> > > > > > > > > > > > (Apex), the Supreme and Ultimate Mundane,
and of
> > the
> > > > Sat
> > > > > > > > Bhai of
> > > > > > > > > > > > Pryaya.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (3) It is a fundamental principle, that
there
> > has
> > > > been a
> > > > > > > > regular
> > > > > > > > > > > > succession from the East of the whole Order;
but
> > > > more
> > > > > > > > especially
> > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > the Sat Bhai, and without this succession,
the
> > chief
> > > > > > title
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Order to universal respect could not exist.
This
> > > > being
> > > > > > so,
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor by whom the succession has been kept
up,
> > and
> > > > > > such
> > > > > > > > > > Sponsors
> > > > > > > > > > > > as have been adopted into it, must in their
dual
> > > > > > capacity,
> > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > well
> > > > > > > > > > > > as individually, be incapable of deposition
or
> > > > > > supersession,
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > without them, and the possession by the
original
> > > > Sponsor
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > Red
> > > > > > > > > > > > Ribbon of the Order, there could not
possibly be
> > any
> > > > > > > > succession,
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > consequently there could be no Order.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (4) But, inasmuch as worldly considerations,
in
> > > > their
> > > > > > narrow
> > > > > > > > > > sense,
> > > > > > > > > > > > are alien to the spiritual instructions of
the
> > > > Sponsors,
> > > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > > > been permitted to delegate their
administrative
> > and
> > > > > > > > executive
> > > > > > > > > > > > powers, in large measure, to the Arch
Censors,
> > who
> > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > accordingly
> > > > > > > > > > > > charged with such duties, while the
legislative
> > > > > > function,
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > veto, personal as well as dual, remains with
the
> > > > former,
> > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > > > > unalienable inheritance, within the Perfect
> > Circle,
> > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > transmitted
> > > > > > > > > > > > by the Sat Bhai of Pryaya.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (5) At any moment of supreme peril to the
> > occidental
> > > > > > home of
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Order of Sikha (Apex), and of the Sat Bhai,
it
> > shall
> > > > be
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > imperative duty of the First Sponsor, who
holds
> > the
> > > > Red
> > > > > > > > Ribbon
> > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > the Order, to summon the Arch Arbiter, the
> > Second
> > > > > > Sponsor,
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > one
> > > > > > > > > > > > Arch Censor, and in their presence to break
the
> > seal
> > > > of
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > letter
> > > > > > > > > > > > from Prag, that contains the special mandate
of
> > the
> > > > Lord
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Perfect Circle, and of the Sat Bhai, such
> > mandate
> > > > being
> > > > > > > > > > absolutely
> > > > > > > > > > > > irresistible, and of effect over the whole
of
> > this
> > > > Code.
> > > > > > And
> > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > the exception of this one reservation, this
Code
> > > > shall
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > irrevocable and incapable of abrogation, and
the
> > > > > > Sponsors,
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > > > > Censors are charged with its application to
the
> > > > > > organisation
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > mystic subjects of the Lord of the Perfect
> > > > Terrestrial
> > > > > > Zone.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (6) Within the Perfect Circle, the mystic
> > numbers
> > > > Nine
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > Seven
> > > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > > pre-eminent, and while the Lord of the
Perfect
> > > > Circle
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsors complete the higher number, the
lower,
> > > > under
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > immediate
> > > > > > > > > > > > influence of the Sat Bhai, is subdivided
into
> > seven
> > > > > > classes,
> > > > > > > > > > namely:-
> > > > > > > > > > > > (1). Arch Censors. (2). Arch Couriers. (3).
Arch
> > > > > > Ministers.
> > > > > > > > (4).
> > > > > > > > > > > > Arch Heralds. (5). Arch Scribes. (6). Arch
> > Auditors.
> > > > > > (7).
> > > > > > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > > > > Mutes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (7) The Arch Censors, being of the highest
> > dignity
> > > > of
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > Sat
> > > > > > > > > > Bhai,
> > > > > > > > > > > > rule the six subordinate classes, and each,
in
> > his
> > > > own
> > > > > > > > > > jurisdiction,
> > > > > > > > > > > > is paramount. In this grade all are equal,
and
> > there
> > > > is
> > > > > > no
> > > > > > > > > > priority.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (8) Each Member of each Censorial Section of
the
> > six
> > > > > > > > subordinate
> > > > > > > > > > > > classes, shall be known personaily only to
his
> > own
> > > > > > Censor,
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > the Sponsors under the Lord of the Perfect
Zone
> > and
> > > > in
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > chain
> > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > secrecy as well as of responsibility
(nccessary
> > for
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > exclusion of
> > > > > > > > > > > > the uninitiated), every second link is
locked
> > > > downwards
> > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > symbols,
> > > > > > > > > > > > signs and countersignshence, the Arch Censor
is
> > only
> > > > > > known
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > his
> > > > > > > > > > > > own Arch Couriers, each of the latter to his
own
> > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > Ministers,
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > so on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (9) No one can be admitted to the four
higher
> > > > classes of
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > Sat
> > > > > > > > > > > > Bhai who has not been previously initiated
in
> > the
> > > > > > Mystery of
> > > > > > > > > > > > Freemasonry; and it is a fundamental decree,
> > that
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > classes
> > > > > > > > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > > > > Censor, and Arch Courier are closed against
all
> > but
> > > > > > Master
> > > > > > > > > > Masons,
> > > > > > > > > > > > and those of higher degree. But the three
lower
> > > > classes
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > open
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > both sexes, at the discretion of each Arch
> > Censor,
> > > > > > within
> > > > > > > > his
> > > > > > > > > > own
> > > > > > > > > > > > jurisdiction.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (10) In order to preserve the due relation
> > between
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > various
> > > > > > > > > > > > grades, and to distinguish those of greater
> > > > exaltation,
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > system
> > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > numbers pervades the whole, so that each
> > individual
> > > > may
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > clearly
> > > > > > > > > > > > distinguished. But mystic names, conferred
by
> > the
> > > > > > Sponsors,
> > > > > > > > > > pertain
> > > > > > > > > > > > exclusively to the four higher classes of
the
> > Sat
> > > > Bhai;
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > lower
> > > > > > > > > > > > receiving only ordinary names. These numbers
run
> > > > thus,
> > > > > > > > > > throughout
> > > > > > > > > > > > the combined Order of Sikha (Apex) and the
Sat
> > Bhai:-
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sikha (Apex)-the Supreme Mundane 1
> > > > > > > > > > > > ................... 2/1 [In a circle.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsors ................... 2/2 "
> > > > > > > > > > > > ................... 2/3 "
> > > > > > > > > > > > A. Censor ................... 3/1 3/2 3/3
&c.
> > > > > > > > > > > > [In a triangle.
> > > > > > > > > > > > A. Courier .................... 4/1 &c. [In
an
> > > > > > > > > > > > ellipse.
> > > > > > > > > > > > A. Minister ................... 5/1 &c. [In
a
> > > > > > > > > > > > parallelogram.
> > > > > > > > > > > > A. Herald ................... 6/1 &c. [In a
> > > > > > > > > > > > lozenge.
> > > > > > > > > > > > A. Scribe ................... 7/1 &c.
[Plain.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > A. Auditor ................... 8/1 &c.
[Plain.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > A. Mute .................... 9/1 &c. [Plain.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Furthermore, to distinguish these grades
within
> > > > their
> > > > > > > > special
> > > > > > > > > > > > Circles, the svmbol of each Arch Censor is
> > prefixed
> > > > to
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > number of
> > > > > > > > > > > > the inferior grade in the manner shown in
plate
> > 1,
> > > > > > figure 1.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 4/1
> > > > > > > > > > > > The Arch Courier 1, of Indra.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > But as the A. C. has three symbols, the
first is
> > > > placed
> > > > > > > > before
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Couriers, the second before the Ministers,
and
> > the
> > > > third
> > > > > > > > before
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Heralds. (11) Each member of each grade
> > nominates
> > > > seven
> > > > > > > > > > assistants,
> > > > > > > > > > > > and these seven, in like manner, seven
> > probationers;
> > > > but
> > > > > > > > these
> > > > > > > > > > > > receive only the simple number of their
> > superior, a
> > > > red
> > > > > > > > line,
> > > > > > > > > > drawn
> > > > > > > > > > > > horizontally through which, indicates an
> > assistant,
> > > > and
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > red
> > > > > > > > > > one,
> > > > > > > > > > > > vertically, a probationer. These auxiliaries
> > qualify
> > > > to
> > > > > > > > become
> > > > > > > > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > > > > Mutes, but are not considered as within the
> > Perfect
> > > > > > Circle,
> > > > > > > > nor
> > > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > > they admitted to its mysteries; they,
however,
> > are
> > > > > > taught
> > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > mystery came from Pryaya, and are employed
to
> > > > advance
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > cause
> > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > universal harmony, and their authority is a
> > brief
> > > > > > prescript
> > > > > > > > > > signed
> > > > > > > > > > > > by the immediate superior, by which their
> > > > subordination,
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > pledged word, is secured.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (12) The Obligation, on the simple word of
> > honour of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > candidate,
> > > > > > > > > > > > in every class throughout the combined
Order, is
> > > > > > accepted as
> > > > > > > > > > > > sufficient. None but men of reputed honour,
true
> > to
> > > > > > their
> > > > > > > > word,
> > > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > > admitted, and to such men, experience shows,
> > that
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > pledged
> > > > > > > > > > word
> > > > > > > > > > > > is as inviolable as the solemn oath, the
latter
> > as
> > > > > > profane,
> > > > > > > > > > being
> > > > > > > > > > > > excluded from the presence of the Lord of
the
> > > > Perfect
> > > > > > > > Circle.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (13) Every member of the Order is bound to
be in
> > > > > > possession
> > > > > > > > of a
> > > > > > > > > > > > mandate or commission, signed in cipher by
the
> > > > Sponsors,
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > endorsed in like manner, by their respective
> > Arch
> > > > > > Censors,
> > > > > > > > > > according
> > > > > > > > > > > > to the system of locked links.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (14) The Arch Censors are not necessarily
known
> > by
> > > > their
> > > > > > > > > > personal
> > > > > > > > > > > > names to each other, but they may hold
congress,
> > > > under
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > sanction
> > > > > > > > > > > > of the sponsors, for the discussion of
important
> > > > matters
> > > > > > > > > > connected
> > > > > > > > > > > > with their own jurisdiction, and within its
> > limits;
> > > > but
> > > > > > one
> > > > > > > > > > > > dissencient voice, whether the whole be
present
> > or
> > > > not,
> > > > > > > > shall
> > > > > > > > > > > > invalidate any regulation framed by such
> > congress,
> > > > and
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > veto
> > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > the Sponsors, individual as well as dual,
will
> > have
> > > > the
> > > > > > same
> > > > > > > > > > effect,
> > > > > > > > > > > > the object being to protect the perhaps
farther
> > > > seeing,
> > > > > > > > > > minority, a
> > > > > > > > > > > > policy taught by the history of mankind.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (15) The Sponsors are to be furnished with
> > quarterly
> > > > > > > > reports,
> > > > > > > > > > > > commencing on the first day of each year, by
> > each
> > > > > > Censor,
> > > > > > > > who in
> > > > > > > > > > > > like manner will- be furnished with the
> > necessary
> > > > > > report, by
> > > > > > > > his
> > > > > > > > > > > > subordinates, and, a return of moneys due
and
> > paid,
> > > > > > shall be
> > > > > > > > > > > > comprised in these reports, in addition to
> > > > > > administrative
> > > > > > > > > > details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (16) These reports will be framed according
to
> > the
> > > > > > nature of
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > duties of each class thus: The Arch Censors
have
> > the
> > > > > > > > > > superintendence
> > > > > > > > > > > > of the Masonic world, from 360 ° to 19 °;
the
> > Arch
> > > > > > Couriers
> > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > 18
> > > > > > > > > > > > ° to 11 %#176;;- The Arch Ministers from 10
° to
> > 4
> > > > °;
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > > > > Heralds from 3 ° to 1 °. The Arch Scribes
are
> > > > charged
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > fiscal
> > > > > > > > > > > > details, the payment of fees for charters,
and
> > > > > > commissions
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Arch Illuminator for materials and work
> > supplied,
> > > > and
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > fees
> > > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > > admission, and exaltation, as settled, and
> > regulated
> > > > by
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > > > > Censors, the latter being charged with a
general
> > > > > > > > supervision.
> > > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > > Arch Auditors and Arch Mutes are charged
with
> > the
> > > > > > collection
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > important information from all sources,
public
> > and
> > > > > > private.
> > > > > > > > > > > > The Sponsors receive no fees, but whatever
is
> > voted
> > > > to
> > > > > > them
> > > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Arch Censors, they may accept.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (17) The Arch Arbiter is the highest
judicial
> > > > > > functionary,
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > known only by his name within the Perfect
> > Circle,
> > > > but
> > > > > > has no
> > > > > > > > > > active
> > > > > > > > > > > > part or responsibility in the Order, and is
> > > > superseded
> > > > > > > > > > periodically.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (18) In each case when a superior is
addressed,
> > he
> > > > must
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > protected
> > > > > > > > > > > > by his inferior against the expenses of a
> > > > correspondence
> > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > > must
> > > > > > > > > > > > necessarily be of vast extent, and which
would
> > be
> > > > > > oppressive
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > superior.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (19) The offices of Arch Emissary, Arch
> > Secretary,
> > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > > Historian,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Arch Treasurer, Arch Auditor and Arch
> > Illuminator
> > > > are
> > > > > > > > tentative,
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > first, fourth, and fifth being extra to the
> > Order.
> > > > Of
> > > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > > > > patronage, the first is in the gift of the
> > Sponsors,
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > second
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > sixth of the first Sponsor, or he who holds
the
> > Red
> > > > > > Ribbon
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > Bell
> > > > > > > > > > > > of the Order, the third, fourth, and fifth,
of
> > the
> > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > Censors.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (20) Among the archives of the Order are
many
> > > > fragments
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > Oriental
> > > > > > > > > > > > antiquity, and these comprise various
documents
> > in
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > ancient
> > > > > > > > > > > > languages of the East. When required to
secure
> > in a
> > > > > > printed
> > > > > > > > > > form,
> > > > > > > > > > > > the Book of Sikha (Apex), and Legend of the
Red
> > > > Ribbon,
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor will receive proposals from the Arch
> > Censors
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > end
> > > > > > > > > > > > in view, one grand object of the Order being
to
> > > > incite
> > > > > > to a
> > > > > > > > > > study of
> > > > > > > > > > > > the great truths contained in early Sanskrit
> > > > literature.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (21) No member of the Order can be
superseded or
> > > > > > expelled,
> > > > > > > > nor
> > > > > > > > > > shall
> > > > > > > > > > > > he have the power to resign his office (and
> > never
> > > > his
> > > > > > > > > > membership)
> > > > > > > > > > > > without the final sanction of the Sponsors,
> > under
> > > > the
> > > > > > advice
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Arch Arbiter, or Hindu referee.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (22) The R.O.O. of Sikha and the Sat Bhai is
the
> > > > only
> > > > > > system
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > Round or Natural Freemasonry.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (23) The signs and passwords of this Order
are
> > > > issued
> > > > > > only
> > > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > First Sponsor triennially, when they are
changed
> > at
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > Vernal
> > > > > > > > > > > > Equinox. No S.B. can share in the rites and
> > councils
> > > > of
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > Order
> > > > > > > > > > > > who is not in possession of the signs and
> > passwords
> > > > of
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > smaller
> > > > > > > > > > > > cycles. But the Illuminated who are in the
> > innermost
> > > > > > circle
> > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > > exempt from ordinary rules. An Arch Censor
may
> > be
> > > > > > > > Illuminated
> > > > > > > > > > > > without preliminary perfection or maturity,
and
> > only
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > Illuminated
> > > > > > > > > > > > are eligible to succeed to the death vacancy
of
> > a
> > > > > > Sponsor.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (24) The great Lotus Seal of the Order is
common
> > to
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Jurisdictions of the Order, but its
custodian
> > must
> > > > be
> > > > > > > > elected in
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > jurisdiction, and subject to the
confirmation of
> > the
> > > > > > First
> > > > > > > > > > Sponsor.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (25) The Code of Sikha (Apex) is the sole
law of
> > the
> > > > > > R.O.O.,
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > immutable. But signs and passwords are
tentative
> > for
> > > > > > fixed
> > > > > > > > > > periods,
> > > > > > > > > > > > and bye-laws may be permitted tentatively by
> > Rahu,
> > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > representative
> > > > > > > > > > > > of Artiram. Nothing is valid without the
> > personal
> > > > and
> > > > > > usual
> > > > > > > > lay
> > > > > > > > > > > > signature of the Arch Secretary to verity
it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (26) The Third Sponsor, as a rule, dormant,
may,
> > by
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > proclamation
> > > > > > > > > > > > of the First Sponsor, be called into
activity
> > and
> > > > > > duality
> > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > him,
> > > > > > > > > > > > whereupon the Second Sponsor becomes for a
> > season or
> > > > > > seasons
> > > > > > > > > > > > dormant. No Sponsor can be also an Arch
Censor,
> > but
> > > > he
> > > > > > may
> > > > > > > > > > > > temporarily discharge the latter's
functions.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (27) The Vernal Equinoxes for changing signs
and
> > > > > > Passwords
> > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1877, 1875, 1878, 1881, 1884, 1887, 1890,
&c.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (28) There are three Seals, viz. -The Great
> > Lotus
> > > > Seal;
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > Key
> > > > > > > > > > Seal
> > > > > > > > > > > > of the Arch Secretary; and the First
Sponsors
> > Privy
> > > > > > Seal;
> > > > > > > > There
> > > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > > also the Arch Censors' segmental Seals.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (29) No Ritual can be used which is not
stamped
> > with
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > Great
> > > > > > > > > > Seal
> > > > > > > > > > > > of the Order produced in Ashayana. So also
> > Perfected
> > > > > > > > Sadhanams,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Marks, and Illuminated Sadhanams are invalid
> > without
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > said
> > > > > > > > > > seal
> > > > > > > > > > > > and the confirmation of the First Sponsor
> > presiding
> > > > in
> > > > > > > > Ashayana.
> > > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > > Order holds Ghonslas Ashayanas, and Nidams,
to
> > which
> > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > is no
> > > > > > > > > > > > admission without Mandate or Sadhanam. The
> > latter is
> > > > > > > > ineffectual
> > > > > > > > > > > > unless endorsed by the Arch Secretary in his
> > usual
> > > > lay
> > > > > > > > > > signature.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (30) No Sat Bhai can resign, but absolute
> > ignoring
> > > > of
> > > > > > O.B.,
> > > > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > > > > notoriously gross act of dishonour involves
de
> > > > facto,
> > > > > > loss
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > rank
> > > > > > > > > > > > to be signified by the First Sponsor and
Arch
> > > > Secretary.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (31) There may be more than one
jurisdiction.
> > That
> > > > of
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > First
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor is the paramount. Each may have its
own
> > A.
> > > > > > Censors,
> > > > > > > > &c.;
> > > > > > > > > > > > Segments may be exchanged.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (32) There are seven Provinces or an
Heptarchy
> > in
> > > > > > England,
> > > > > > > > > > Scotland,
> > > > > > > > > > > > and Ireland. Mahanathas rule these by
charter
> > under
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > Great
> > > > > > > > > > Seal
> > > > > > > > > > > > of the Order. The Sponsors form the Court of
> > Appeal
> > > > of
> > > > > > > > these,
> > > > > > > > > > but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor can receive any donative or fee of
> > intrinsic
> > > > > > value.
> > > > > > > > In
> > > > > > > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > > > > case gifts must be honorary, such as
> > testimonials on
> > > > > > > > parchment.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (33) 'The Feathers of the Sat Bhai',
> > Archaeological
> > > > > > Tracts
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > R.O.O. may be under the editorship of any
S.B.
> > duly
> > > > > > > > appointed.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > SYMBOLS, ETC.
> > > > > > > > > > > > The symbols, Paroles and countersigns,
ancient
> > and
> > > > > > modern,
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Royal Oriental Order of Sikha (Apex) and of
the
> > Sat
> > > > Bhai
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > Pryaya.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (1) The Symbols of Sikha (Apex) are:- (1)
The
> > > > Mundane
> > > > > > Egg.
> > > > > > > > (2).
> > > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > > Crossed Square within a Perfect circle. (3).
The
> > > > Fruit
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > Sacred
> > > > > > > > > > > > Lotus. (4). The Harmonic Octave, expressed
by
> > its
> > > > > > graphic
> > > > > > > > > > expression
> > > > > > > > > > > > of a double shell. (5) The Anga. (6) A swan.
(7)
> > A
> > > > Bull.
> > > > > > > > [plate
> > > > > > > > > > 1,
> > > > > > > > > > > > figures 1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The Symbol of the
Sat
> > Bhai
> > > > is
> > > > > > Seven
> > > > > > > > Grey
> > > > > > > > > > > > Feathers, 2,3, and 2
> > > > > > > > > > > > (2) The symbols of the Dual Sponsors are -
> > (1).The
> > > > > > Crescent
> > > > > > > > > > Moon.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (2). The Signs of the Ascending and of the
> > > > descending
> > > > > > Node.
> > > > > > > > Of
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > first Sponsor-- (1). The Rose. (2) The
Kamalata.
> > (3)
> > > > An
> > > > > > > > Arrow.
> > > > > > > > > > Of
> > > > > > > > > > > > the Second Sponsor--(1). An Unicorn's Horn.
(2)
> > The
> > > > > > > > Amaranth. Of
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Dormant Sponsor--The Sun in eclipse.
> > > > > > > > > > > > The parole or pass-word to the Sponsors
> > > > is ......... ;
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > sign,
> > > > > > > > > > > > touching the......... of the .........
> > > > > > > > > > > > (3) The Arch Censors are in the third yug
> > symbolised
> > > > by
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > Boar
> > > > > > > > > > > > avatar (plate 1, figure 18]. Their
distinctive
> > > > symbols
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > three
> > > > > > > > > > > > each:-
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Indra I A Thunderbolt 2 A Lamp 3.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Ganesha 1 An EIephant 2 A Conch 3.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 3. Agni 1 A Flame 2 A Lotus 3.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 4. Surya 1 A Wheel 2 Sunflower 3.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 5. Kartikeya 1 A Peacock 2 A Sword 3.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 6. Kama 1 A Parrot 2 A Bent Bow 3.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 7. Daksha 1 A Dexter Hand 2 An Ear of Wheat
> > > > > > > > > > > > 3.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The pass-word to the Arch Censors
is......... ;
> > the
> > > > > > sign,
> > > > > > > > > > touching
> > > > > > > > > > > > the......... of the right .........
> > > > > > > > > > > > (4) The Arch Couriers are in the fourth yug,
of
> > > > which
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > symbol
> > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > a lion-headed man. They have one distinctive
> > symbol
> > > > each
> > > > > > > > placed
> > > > > > > > > > > > under their respective A. Censor's first
symbol.
> > The
> > > > > > > > password to
> > > > > > > > > > > > this grade is......... ; the sign, touching
> > > > the.........
> > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > the......... forefinger.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (5) The Arch Ministers are in the fifth yug,
> > > > symbolised
> > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > two
> > > > > > > > > > > > interlaced triangles. They have one
distinctive
> > > > symbol
> > > > > > each,
> > > > > > > > > > placed
> > > > > > > > > > > > under their respective A. Censor's second
> > symbol.
> > > > The
> > > > > > > > password
> > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > this grade is......... ; the sign, touching
> > > > the.........
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > the.........
> > > > > > > > > > > > (6) The Arch Heralds are in the sixth yug,
for
> > which
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > symbol
> > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > an antique crown. They have one distinctive
> > symbol
> > > > each,
> > > > > > > > placed
> > > > > > > > > > > > under their respective A. Censor's third
symbol.
> > The
> > > > > > > > password to
> > > > > > > > > > > > this grade is......... the sign, the
> > palms.........
> > > > > > > > > > > > (7) The Arch Scribes are in the seventh yug.
> > There
> > > > are
> > > > > > no
> > > > > > > > > > symbols in
> > > > > > > > > > > > this grade, but the A. Ss. have distinctive
> > numbers
> > > > in
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > Nagara
> > > > > > > > > > > > character. Pass-word.......... No sign.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (8) The Arch Auditors are in the eighth yug.
> > They
> > > > have
> > > > > > each
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > Devanagri letter before their names, under
the
> > > > > > Minister's
> > > > > > > > > > symbol. No
> > > > > > > > > > > > password. No sign.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (9) The Arch Mutes are in the ninth yug:
They
> > have
> > > > each
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > letter
> > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > the Devanagri character before their names
and
> > under
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > Herald's
> > > > > > > > > > > > symbol. No pass-word. No sign.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Nomenclature of the Arch Grades, under the
Lord
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > Perfect
> > > > > > > > > > Zone,
> > > > > > > > > > > > 360 °:-
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Sponsor.............. Rahu
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2 Sponsor.............. Ketu
> > > > > > > > > > > > 3 Kamadyam......... [Dormant]
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Arch Censor Indra 1 Arch Minister
> > > > > > > > > > > > Dhanus
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2 " " Ganesha 2 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > Mesha
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 3 " " Agni 3 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > Vrisha
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 4 " " Surya 4 " " Simha
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 5 " " Kartikeya 5 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > Makara
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 6 " " Kama 6 " " Kumba
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 7 " " Daksha 7 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > Karkata
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Arch Courier Kuvera 1 Arch Herald
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sanjaya
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2 " " Vira Badra 2 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > Heri
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 3 " " Bhairava 3 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > Rama
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 4 " " Varuna 4 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > Nareda
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 5 " " Yama 5 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > Agastya
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 6 " " Garuda 6 " " Hotri
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 7 " " Aruna 7 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > Petri
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Arch Scribe Pravaha 1 Arch Auditor Rad
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2 " " Avaha 2 " " Tara
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 3 " " Udraha 3 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > Nadiyan
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 4 " " Samkaha 4 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > Ankhen
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 5 " " Vivaha 5 " " Kan
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 6 " " Parivaha 6 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > Udaka
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 7 " " Nivaha 7 " " Vayu
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Arch Mute Kalga fem. Narangi
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2 " " Pipat " Angur
> > > > > > > > > > > > 3 " " Bat " Zaitun
> > > > > > > > > > > > 4 " " Champa " Seb
> > > > > > > > > > > > 5 " " Tulasi " Angir
> > > > > > > > > > > > 6 " " Singarhar " Badan
> > > > > > > > > > > > 7 " " Soma " Anar
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > (10) Oriental garments being disused, except
the
> > > > Grey
> > > > > > Choga
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > Cap,
> > > > > > > > > > > > the only mark of membership is a red silk
cord
> > of
> > > > three
> > > > > > > > strands,
> > > > > > > > > > > > round the neck.
> > > > > > > > > > > > The general pass-word is......... The
colours of
> > the
> > > > > > Order
> > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > Red,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Blue, White; those of Sponsors, Red, Blue,
> > Yellow;
> > > > and
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > Segments,
> > > > > > > > > > > > the Prismatic.
> > > > > > > > > > > > MONETARY REGULATIONS
> > > > > > > > > > > > Under the supervision of the Arch Censors,
Arch
> > > > > > Treasurer,
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > > > > Scribes, and extra to the Order.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (1) A reserve fund for charity, and the use
of
> > the
> > > > > > > > intelligence
> > > > > > > > > > > > department, is to be formed.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (2) The Sponsors having renounced all Claim
on
> > the
> > > > funds
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Order, they may accept donations as
offerings to
> > > > Sikha
> > > > > > > > (Apex)
> > > > > > > > > > > > without injury to the spiritual element, if
> > > > voluntarily,
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > unconditionally made by the Arch Censors.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (3) The Arch Censors and their subordinates
are
> > > > entitled
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > remuneration for actual work done. The Arch
> > Censors'
> > > > > > > > regulations
> > > > > > > > > > > > must be accepted, if promulgated by the
Seven in
> > > > > > Congress,
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > unanimous.
> > > > > > > > > > > > 4) The Arch Secretary is entitled to
recompense
> > for
> > > > time
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > outlay.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (5) The Arch Illuminator is entitled to
> > recompense
> > > > for
> > > > > > time
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > outlay, in preparing charters or
commissions,
> > &c.
> > > > His
> > > > > > > > charges
> > > > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > > > been allowed. For a parchment charter, if
> > required
> > > > > > > > illuminated,
> > > > > > > > > > one
> > > > > > > > > > > > guinea; for a prescript or mandate, two
> > shillings
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > sixpence;
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > for symbols of Sponsors and Censors, each
one
> > > > shilling.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (6) The Arch Treasurer is entitled to a
> > percentage
> > > > on
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > funds,
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > same to be fixed by the Arch Censors in
> > Congress.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (7) The other Arch Officers receive
remuneration
> > > > > > according
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > duties
> > > > > > > > > > > > performed, or expenses incurred.
> > > > > > > > > > > > (8) The first Occidental Arch Censors, under
the
> > > > > > > > dispensation of
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Lord of the Perfect Zone, have entered the
> > Circle
> > > > free;
> > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > > > > successors, and those of the grades under
their
> > > > > > > > jurisdiction,
> > > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > > required to pay the following fees to the
Arch
> > > > Treasurer
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > Arch Censors:-
> > > > > > > > > > > > £ s. d. £ s. d.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > A. Mute " " A. Auditor " "
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > A. Scribe " " A. Herald "
> > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > A. Minister " " A. Courier "
> > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > A. Censor £ " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > These fees may be regulated from time to
time.
> > > > > > > > > > > > To obviate the inconvenience of disclosing
the
> > > > titles of
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > Order
> > > > > > > > > > > > to the outer world, the postal address will
> > > > > > be 'Secretary
> > > > > > > > (or
> > > > > > > > > > other)
> > > > > > > > > > > > of the Royal Oriental S. B. Order.'
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In theos-
> > talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline"
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Carl, Tillett, Friends,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > OK.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > So HPB was an "honorary member" of the Sat
> > Bhai,
> > > > and
> > > > > > this,
> > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > > early as 1877.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Honorary member is no active member; it
means
> > that
> > > > a
> > > > > > > > homage
> > > > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > > > made to her.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Not the only one -- as she had a diploma
> > > > > > from "Adoption
> > > > > > > > > > Masonry",
> > > > > > > > > > > > too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Honorary titles.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, Carlos.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cópia:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Data:Sat, 4 Nov 2006 07:12:20 +1100 (EST)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Assunto:Theos-World HPB and Sat B'hai
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In April, 1878, HPB and Colonel Olcott
> > discussed
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > possibility, and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > concluded that it would serve to
> > restore "the
> > > > vital
> > > > > > > > element
> > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > Oriental
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mysticism" to the higher degrees. But
there
> > were
> > > > > > > > objections
> > > > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > > > Indian
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > members of the TS, and the scheme was
> > abandoned.
> > > > > > > > However,
> > > > > > > > > > both
> > > > > > > > > > > > HPB and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Olcott were made Honorary Members of the
Sat
> > > > B'hai,
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > August 9,
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1877.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > HPB was made a member of the sixth
degree,
> > level
> > > > > > one,
> > > > > > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > > > > Auditor; the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > name of this degree and level was Rad,
and,
> > like
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > fifth
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > seventh
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > degrees, was open both non-Masons and to
> > women.
> > > > HSO
> > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > made
> > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > member of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the second degree, sixth level. Arch
> > Courier;
> > > > the
> > > > > > name
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > degree was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Garuda, and it was open only to Master
> > Masons
> > > > (as
> > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > > > > degree).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In Sat B'hai the first degree was the
> > highest,
> > > > and
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > seventh
> > > > > > > > > > > > the lowest.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Royal Oriental Order of Sikha (Apex)
and
> > the
> > > > Sat
> > > > > > > > B'hai
> > > > > > > > > > seems
> > > > > > > > > > > > to have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > been founded by an Anglo-Indian, Captain
> > James
> > > > Henry
> > > > > > > > > > Lawrence
> > > > > > > > > > > > Archer of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Indian Army, but the organization of
the
> > > > Order
> > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > largely
> > > > > > > > > > > > of the work
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > of Kenneth Robert Henderson Mackenzie
(1833-
> > 86),
> > > > > > author
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > the "Royal
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Masonic Cyclopaedia" (1877), and a
member of
> > the
> > > > TS.
> > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > > > > public
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > statements about the Order appeared in
> > > > > > correspondence
> > > > > > > > > > in "The
> > > > > > > > > > > > Freemason"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in early 1871, however although great
claims
> > > > were
> > > > > > made
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > its
> > > > > > > > > > > > antiquity
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and importance, and despite Mackenzie's
> > efforts
> > > > to
> > > > > > > > establish
> > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > as a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > working organization, it does not seem
to
> > have
> > > > moved
> > > > > > > > much
> > > > > > > > > > beyond
> > > > > > > > > > > > being a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > plan. By January, 1879, Mackenzie had
> > concluded
> > > > that
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > Order
> > > > > > > > > > > > had
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > finished.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Sat B'hai was never adopted for use
> > within
> > > > the
> > > > > > TS.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Information on the membership of HPB and
HSO
> > in
> > > > Sat
> > > > > > > > B'hai
> > > > > > > > > > comes
> > > > > > > > > > > > from the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > archives of the Order which were (and, I
> > > > believe,
> > > > > > still
> > > > > > > > are)
> > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > the Yarker
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > archives in London, where I had access
to
> > them.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dr Gregory Tillett
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > E-mail classificado pelo Identificador
de
> > Spam
> > > > > > > > Inteligente
> > > > > > > > > > Terra.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Para alterar a categoria classificada,
visite
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
+_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1162584750.900794.6252.balcomo.hst.terra.com.b
> > > > > > > > > > > > r,5563,Des15,Des15
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail
> > > > Protegido
> > > > > > Terra.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan /
Atualizado
> > em
> > > > > > > > 03/11/2006 /
> > > > > > > > > > > > Versão: 4.4.00/4888
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra:
> > > > http://mail.terra.com.br/
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have
been
> > > > removed]
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de
Spam
> > > > > > Inteligente
> > > > > > > > Terra.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
+_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1162647475.70441.5840.curepipe.hst.terra.com.b
> > > > > > > > > > r,27710,20031127114101,20031127114101
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail
> > Protegido
> > > > Terra.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado
em
> > > > > > 03/11/2006 /
> > > > > > > > > > Versão: 4.4.00/4888
> > > > > > > > > > > > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra:
> > http://mail.terra.com.br/
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> > removed]
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam
> > > > Inteligente
> > > > > > Terra.
> > > > > > > > > > Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> > > > > > > > > >
> > http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
+_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1162652147.567450.11079.arrino.hst.terra.com.b
> > > > > > > > r,32755,20031127114101,20031127114101
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail
Protegido
> > Terra.
> > > > > > > > > > Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em
> > > > 03/11/2006 /
> > > > > > > > Versão: 4.4.00/4888
> > > > > > > > > > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra:
http://mail.terra.com.br/
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been
removed]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam
> > Inteligente
> > > > Terra.
> > > > > > > > Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> > > > > > > >
http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
+_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1162780372.648345.26989.baladonia.hst.terra.co
> > > > > > m.br,41474,20031127114101,20031127114101
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido
Terra.
> > > > > > > > Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em
> > 03/11/2006 /
> > > > > > Versão: 4.4.00/4888
> > > > > > > > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam
Inteligente
> > Terra.
> > > > > > Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> > > > > > http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?
> > > >
> >
+_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1162822607.447740.23059.vacoas.hst.terra.com.b
> > > > r,48716,20031127114101,20031127114101
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> > > > > > Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em
03/11/2006 /
> > > > Versão: 4.4.00/4888
> > > > > > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam Inteligente
Terra.
> > > > Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> > > > http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?
> >
+_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1162877017.798290.14324.baladonia.hst.terra.co
> > m.br,56255,20031127114101,20031127114101
> > > >
> > > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> > > > Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 06/11/2006 /
> > Versão: 4.4.00/4889
> > > > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam Inteligente Terra.
> > Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> > http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?
+_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1162982318.570176.19001.arrino.hst.terra.com.b
r,66836,20031127114101,20031127114101
> >
> > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> > Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 07/11/2006 /
Versão: 4.4.00/4890
> > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application
