Theos-Talk Archives (November 2006 Message tt00525)

[[I have several more points on "A 
> Queer Theosophical Question" and want to 
> get them out, as they keep banging around 
> in my head until I do, ]]


I'm not sure they are really banging around anyone else's heads 
though. 


[[and then that 
> will be the end of commentary from me, 
> hopefully. ]] 

Well, you said it . . .

[[The pendulum is swinging the 
> other way and homosexuality is not so 
> "stylish" as it used to be, and maybe a 
> few more ears are open.  (Actually, being 
> 'stylish' is exactly why, or a contributing 
> factor, why some decide to "go queer.")]]


Umm, it isn't in fact, not even slightly . . . so can we safely 
assume the rest of your argument is the odious rubbish it appears to 
be at first blush ?  


[[(1) Some go queer because of Fear 
> (partly justifiable.)  In this overly-competitive, 
> cut-throat and over-populated world, there 
> are constant financial, physical, and 
> psychological dangers to fear.  If one 
> is "harmless" he's less likely to get 
> attacked.  The effeminant male homosexual 
> to perceptions is as overtly "harmless" 
> a pose as can be.  They get left alone 
> and not attacked, ]]


Umm, have you ever heard of Daniel Shepherd.  Sigh, why bother . . .




[[One knowledgeable guy I knew used 
> to claim that the reason Tibet got taken 
> over by the Chinese was that most the 
> monasteries became homosexual,]] 


What else did he tell you ?  He does sound like a fun fellow to be 
around, I'll give you that. 


Oh wait, there's more . . .  

[[This same guy said that if male
> and female homosexuals get together, they
> can exchange elementals and cure each 
> other.  ]]


Did he, just ?  What a pioneer.  

And he, umm, presented you with successful examples of his research 
to prove his notion ? 

[[FINIS]]

Well, you've written one thing I agree with. 

Ben 
(singularly unapologetic poof)