Theos-Talk Archives (November 2006 Message tt00608)

The historian Gregory Tillett wrote:

=====================================================
The DES claimed to be on "the original lines" of the ES under HPB. It 
taught that HPB remained the Real Head of the School, and wherever 
she was referred to, capital letters (including She and Her) are used.
=====================================================
Quoted from:  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/36730

If the claim is made in the ULT's Dzyan Esoteric School that HPB is 
the Real Head of the School, exactly what does that claim IMPLY or 
actually mean?

Furthermore, remember what HPB said in the "Preliminary Memorandum":

"The real Head of the Esoteric Section is a Master, of whom H.P.
Blavatsky is the mouthpiece for this Section. . . . It is through 
H.P. Blavatsky that each member of this section will be brought more 
closely than hitherto under His influence and care if found worthy of 
it."
Quoted from: http://www.katinkahesselink.net/esinstr.htm#prelim1

Does this claim by the DES imply such a potential relationship or 
even "contact" as what HPB was writing about in 1888?

In my series of examples given to Jake about forming an esoteric 
group, if Victor in the 1890s or Glen in the 1970s made a similar 
claim that in their esoteric groups HPB is the real head, would that 
be any different or less valid than what the Dzyan Esoteric School is 
apparently claiming????

Food for thought....

Daniel
http://hpb.cc