Theos-Talk Archives (December 2006 Message tt00734)

Mr. Aveline writes:

==========================================================
Yet due to the public attitude dr. Tillett expressed in Theos-talk with 
regard to the ULT -- and this, after I tried to 'make a bridge' with 
ULT-LA -- I guess one should not be too anxious to see an answer.

It might come any minute. It might not come.
=========================================================

Yes, Dr. Tillett gave what appears to be his honest and frank
observations.  Is something wrong with that approach????

Yet from what Mr. Aveline writes above, it is almost as though Aveline 
is saying that the ULT or Dennis might not want to answer those 
questions BECAUSE of the "the public attitude dr. Tillett expressed."

If Tillett had not publicly expressed his opinion as he did, the 
ULT/Dennis might have done otherwise and answered his questions. Is 
that one of the implications of Mr. Aveline's statements?  Is that what 
Mr. Aveline is suggesting??

It seems to me that the ULT/Dennis should just answer the questions 
regardless of what Dr. Tillett expressed.  Maybe if they were 
forthright and open, Dr. Tillett's attitude might actually change. 

Daniel