Theos-Talk Archives (December 2008 Message tt00253)

My views are:

The "darkness" mentioned by Blavatsky is about when Jesus (Joshua Pandira) was born and when he taught. Today the Christian Church is, as far as I view it, still in darkness, and a number of those who call themselves filled with wisdom are also in darkness, because they find the Bible to be infallible.


M. Sufilight

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: christinaleestemaker 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 6:29 PM
  Subject: Re: Theos-World 2012 ?


  So what after 33 years? If 1-33 is darkness, is not the whole 
  darkness?
  Christina

  / 
  --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-
  theosophy@...> wrote:
  >
  > Dear friends
  > 
  > My views are:
  > 
  > Blavatsky and Master said that Jesus was born in Lod (Lydda) year 
  120 BC.
  > 
  > W. C. Leadbeater and Annie Besant said 105 BC. And Alice A. Bailey 
  wrote a book titled "From Bethlehem to Calvary" saying in this book, 
  that "the historical accuracy of His story remains as yet unsolved" 
  and "for when He was born at Bethlehem, it was not simply the birth 
  of another divine Teacher and Messenger" .
  > 
  > 
  > Now who is telling the truth?
  > 
  > - - -
  > 
  > H. P. Blavatsky on the New Testament and Jesus:
  > "This theory of the seven keys, the Church, according to the Abbé 
  Roca, has simplified "without disfiguring it," reducing the keys to 
  three; while, on the contrary, it has fabricated three false keys 
  which do not open anything. The legend of which I speak is founded, 
  as I have demonstrated over and over again in my writings and my 
  notes, on the existence of a personage called Jehoshua (from which 
  Jesus has been made) born at Lüd or Lydda about 120 years before the 
  modern era. And if this fact is denied-to which I can hardly object-
  one must resign oneself to regard the hero of the drama of Calvary as 
  a myth pure and simple. As a matter of fact, in spite of all the 
  desperate research made during long centuries, if we set aside the 
  testimony of the "Evangelists," i.e., unknown men whose identity has 
  never been established, and that of the Fathers of the Church, 
  interested fanatics, neither history, nor profane tradition, neither 
  official documents, nor the contemporaries of the soi-disant drama, 
  are able to provide one single serious proof of the historical and 
  real existence, not only of the Man-God but even of him called Jesus 
  of Nazareth, from the year 1 to the year 33. All is darkness and 
  silence." 
  > (H. P. Blavatsly's Collected Writings, vol. 9, p. 225-6). 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > M. Sufilight
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > From: christinaleestemaker 
  > To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 5:31 PM
  > Subject: Re: Theos-World 2012 ?
  > 
  > 
  > Right, no one can be sure, for we have not been in the time Jezus 
  was 
  > born.It was written that he was there long before the counting 
  > started in the year 1 from our calender
  > 
  > Christina
  > 
  > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Cass Silva <silva_cass@> wrote:
  > >
  > > Not sure what you are getting at Christina
  > > Cass
  > > 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > ________________________________
  > > From: christinaleestemaker <christinaleestemaker@>
  > > To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
  > > Sent: Wednesday, 17 December, 2008 10:03:26 PM
  > > Subject: Theos-World 2012 ?
  > > 
  > > 
  > > I read somewhere Leon wrote to Cass the change in 2012 but we 
  must 
  > > not forget that our beginning of yearcounting happened 7 years 
  > after 
  > > Jezus birthday.
  > > Christina
  > > 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > 
  > > Start your day with Yahoo!7 and win a Sony Bravia TV. Enter 
  > now http://au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset/?
  p1=other&p2=au&p3=tagline
  > > 
  > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  > >
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]