theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Anand on his comments about what the Chohan said

Mar 06, 2009 01:43 PM
by danielhcaldwell


Anand,

I have no idea what you are meaning when you use the word
"blasphemers" in reference to Blavatsky students.

And when you write about "Blavatskian's hearts were hardened",
again it is not clear what you are talking about.

There are Blavatsky students of ALL personality types and
temperaments just as there are Christians of all different
temperaments.

I've meet some Christians who are kind and sweet and others
that were the very opposite.  Some of them were judgmental, dogmatic,
negative and condemning of people and beliefs that didn't meet their
standards, etc.  But other Christians were thoughtful and
considerate.  

The same observations I made about the Christians would ALSO apply to
the Blavatsky students I've met and have known.

And in meeting people of all different beliefs and religions other
than Christian (for example, Buddhists, Jains, Hindus, etc) and even
atheists and materialists, some were nice people, BUT others not the
kind of people I would want as personal friends or even neighbors.

It seems to me you are making rash and unfounded generalizations, all
black and white distinctions with no gray inbetween.  So maybe you
need to rethink your views on all of this.  But you decide.

But I see that you did NOT address directly my comments in regard to
what you said about the Chohan and what he meant.

Daniel
http://hpb.cc




[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application