Theos-Talk Archives (March 2009 Message tt00216)

Dear Anand and friends

My views are:

You did not answer my question.

I never said, that I accepted a Christ made Flesh. H. P. Blavatsky never did.
Where did you get that idea from?

Saying, that Jesus was a historical person is not necessarily implying, that one says, that Jesus was "Christ made flesh". Does it?


M. Sufilight

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Anand 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 10:58 PM
  Subject: Theos-World Re: Blavatsky on CARNALIZING the central figure of the New Testament


  Morten's message 49429

  There are several examples, where HPB clearly were alluding to the fact that
  Jesus was a historical person. Try H. P. Blavatsky, Isis Unveiled, 1877, vol.
  I,
  p. xxxviii, 2, 34, 57, 130, 138 etc. etc. And try H. P. Blavatsky, (The
  beginners book) The Key to Theosophy, 1889, p. 47, 49, 71, 72, 79, 81 etc
  etc..

  --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-theosophy@...> wrote:
  >
  > Dear Anand and friends
  > 
  > My views are:
  > 
  > I never said, that I accepted a Christ made Flesh.
  > Where did you get that idea from?
  > 
  > 
  > M. Sufilight
  > 
  > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > From: Anand 
  > To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  > Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 10:39 PM
  > Subject: Theos-World Re: Blavatsky on CARNALIZING the central figure of the New Testament
  > 
  > 
  > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "danielhcaldwell" <danielhcaldwell@> wrote:
  > >
  > > H.P. Blavatsky wrote in December 1887:
  > > 
  > .
  > > . . . true Theosophists will never accept ...a Christ made
  > > Flesh. . . .[390]
  > > ------------------------------------------------------
  > > 
  > > Quoted from H.P. Blavatsky's COLLECTED WRITINGS, Volume VIII.
  > > caps added.
  > > 
  > > http://hpb.cc
  > --------------------------------------
  > Compare Daniel's above message with message of other follower of Blavatsky, Morten. He wrote in his message 49429 this and says historical Jesus existed. It shows how two followers of Blavatsky had contradictory ideas and it shows how Blavatsky's writing creates confusion. Below is Morten's message.
  > --------------------------------
  > 1. H. P. Blavatsky, in Isis Unviled, p. xii:
  > "To you," said Jesus to his elect disciples, "it is given to know the mysteries
  > of the Kingdom of God, but to them [ the polloi^ ] it is not given; . . .
  > therefore speak I to them in parables [or allegories]; because they seeing, see
  > not, and hearing, they hear not, neither do they understand." - Gospel
  > according to Matthew, xiii. 11, 13.
  > http://www.phx-ult-lodge.org/isis_unveiled1.htm
  > 
  > There are several examples, where HPB clearly were alluding to the fact that
  > Jesus was a historical person. Try H. P. Blavatsky, Isis Unveiled, 1877, vol. I,
  > p. xxxviii, 2, 34, 57, 130, 138 etc. etc. And try H. P. Blavatsky, (The
  > beginners book) The Key to Theosophy, 1889, p. 47, 49, 71, 72, 79, 81 etc etc..
  > ---------------------------------------
  > 
  > Best
  > Anand Gholap
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >


  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]