Theos-Talk Archives (February 2010 Message tt00031)

To clarify any theory of consciousness that rests on the proposition that consciousness (awareness, will, qualia, etc.) or the qualities of pure subjectivity, is a fundamental aspect of total space and that it is complementary to the equally fundamental objective source of all matter-energy fields (the ZP spin momentum located everywhere) ? I would like to make the following observations:

Obviously, as far as any individual POV is concerned, the entire visible physical universe is seen as a holographic image (in an apparently non-material field of mind or memory) ? since all its radiant or reflected visual information converges at every zero-påoint in spherical space between the perceiver and the objects of perception.

Therefore, every zero-point in 3-dimensional space ? since it contains all the information of the entire visible universe surrounding that point ? must be a completely grainless hologram (or at least grainless as far as the diameter of the smallest sub-quantum particle in the Planck false vacuum is concerned). So, what we actually see in the mind?s eye is a reconstructed analogous higher order holographic light image of various relative frequencies, representing color, tone, shade, etc.

What?s the difference between all those empty points of primal space, and the zero-point of awareness in the center of our head, from which we perceive the surrounding universe as a holographic image (after the brain transforms the 2-d image on the retina to a hologram on the surface of the brain?s assembled EM field ? which is resonant with the higher order mind-memory fields in hyperspace)?

Wouldn?t that necessitate that each such zero-point point of awareness is of a different quality (subjectivity) than the surrounding matter fields (objectivity) ? including the total space-time?s electro-gravitational fields themselves (including the hyperspace fields in the Planck false vacuum) ? which are simply a more tenuous form of primal matter generated from the fundamental spin momentum of the ZP ?singularity? located everywhere?

It follows, then, that all the visual light information converging on each potential POV must be a hologram (with respect to our individual viewpoint) that is carried on the surfaces of the surrounding radiant mind and memory fields, as frequency modulated wave interference patterns.

Such patterns can be easily reconstructed into a holographic image by radiation of a coherent ZPE field and its reflection back to the conscious zero-point source of the higher order mind-memory fields (linked resonantly to the brain?s EM field). This is described in more detail at my google knol at:
http://tinyurl.com/astrobiocoen

Incidentally, this is a completely scientific view of consciousness and its origin, functions and mechanisms ? although it doesn?t entirely conform with the current matter only paradigm of conventional reductive science.

Since the light images we actually perceive in wakeful vision, dreams, or in memory would have to be at a level of energy one or more orders weaker than the photon energy that impinges directly on the retinas ? these mind and memory fields would have to be harmonically resonant with the EM field of the brain carrying the hologram of the neural processed retinal images on its surface.

In conclusion, in order for consciousness to be sensitive enough to be aware of the finest vibrations of the endogenously processed light images that we experience in such dream states or when in deep contemplation of higher states of consciousness ? it must be absolutely stationary.

Therefore, it could only be an aspect of the eternal unconditioned (inert, static) absolute zero space that is separate from and outside of all vibrating energy fields that carry the holographic information of consciousness as modulated wave interference patterns on their surfaces (even though these fields originate from the spin momentum surroundong that stationary zero-point).

Incidentally, this ZP center of our visual consciousness could bery well correspond to the "third eye' spoken of in most Eastern philosophies.

Best wishes,
Leon Maurer

To clarify any theory of consciousness that rests on the proposition that consciousness (awareness, will, qualia, etc.) or the qualities of pure subjectivity, is a fundamental aspect of total space and that it is complementary to the equally fundamental objective source of all matter-energy fields (the ZP spin momentum located everywhere) ? I would like to make the following observations:

Obviously, as far as any individual POV is concerned, the entire visible physical universe is seen as a holographic image (in an apparently non-material field of mind or memory) ? since all its radiant or reflected visual information converges at every zero-point in spherical space between the perceiver and the objects of perception.

Therefore, every zero-point in 3-dimensional space ? since it contains all the information of the entire visible universe surrounding that point ? must be a completely grainless hologram (or at least grainless as far as the diameter of the smallest sub-quantum particle in the Planck false vacuum is concerned). So, what we actually see in the mind?s eye is a reconstructed analogous higher order holographic light image of various relative frequencies, representing color, tone, shade, etc.

What?s the difference between all those empty points of primal space, and the zero-point of awareness in the center of our head, from which we perceive the surrounding universe as a holographic image (after the brain transforms the 2-d image on the retina to a hologram on the surface of the brain?s assembled EM field ? which is resonant with the higher order mind-memory fields in hyperspace)?

Wouldn?t that necessitate that each such zero-point point of awareness is of a different quality (subjectivity) than the surrounding matter fields (objectivity) ? including the total space-time?s electro-gravitational fields themselves (including the hyperspace fields in the Planck false vacuum) ? which are simply a more tenuous form of primal matter generated from the fundamental spin momentum of the ZP ?singularity? located everywhere?

It follows, then, that all the visual light information converging on each potential POV must be a hologram (with respect to our individual viewpoint) that is carried on the surfaces of the surrounding radiant mind and memory fields, as frequency modulated wave interference patterns.

Such patterns can be easily reconstructed into a holographic image by radiation of a coherent ZPE field and its reflection back to the conscious zero-point source of the higher order mind-memory fields (linked resonantly to the brain?s EM field). This is described in more detail at my google knol at:
http://tinyurl.com/astrobiocoen

Incidentally, this is a completely scientific view of consciousness and its origin, functions and mechanisms ? although it doesn?t entirely conform with the current matter only paradigm of conventional reductive science.

Since the light images we actually perceive in wakeful vision, dreams, or in memory would have to be at a level of energy one or more orders weaker than the photon energy that impinges directly on the retinas ? these mind and memory fields would have to be harmonically resonant with the EM field of the brain carrying the hologram of the neural processed retinal images on its surface.

In conclusion, in order for consciousness to be sensitive enough to be aware of the finest vibrations of the endogenously processed light images that we experience in such dream states or when in deep contemplation of higher states of consciousness ? it must be absolutely stationary.

Therefore, it could only be an aspect of the eternal unconditioned (inert, static) absolute zero space that is separate from and outside of all vibrating energy fields that carry the holographic information of consciousness as modulated wave interference patterns on their surfaces (even though these fields originate from the spin momentum surroundong that stationary zero-point).

Incidentally, this ZP center of our visual consciousness could bery well correspond to the "third eye' spoken of in most Eastern philosophies.

Best wishes,
Leon Maurer
http://dzyanmaster.wordpress.com=


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]