theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Theos-World Bring the Theosophical Society back to its original lines!

Feb 14, 2010 08:23 AM
by Drpsionic


That's a good start.
 
Chuck the Heretic
 
_www.charlescosimano.com  

 
In a message dated 2/13/2010 11:01:02 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
Augoeides-222@comcast.net writes:

 
 
 
Chuck, 
It is simple. His name wasn't Chuck! Lmao!!! 
John 
-----  Original Message ----- 
From: 




_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _Drpsionic@aol.Drp_ 
(mailto:Drpsionic@aol.com) _ 
To: _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _theos-talk@yahoogrotheos-t_ 
(mailto:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com) _ 
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010  8:37:20 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: Re: Theos-World Bring the  Theosophical Society back to its 
original lines! 

Is there a good  reason not to think that Patanjali wrote hogwash? How do 
we know that he  had any actual of idea of what he was saying and not just 
making things  up? 

Chuck the Heretic 

www.charlescosimanowww.c

In  a message dated 2/12/2010 8:54:29 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _Augoeides-222@Augoeides-2_ 
(mailto:Augoeides-222@comcast.net)  writes: 

Morten, 
It's their  own fault for not taking Patanjali's Yoga Sutra into 
consideration or  maybe they just thought it was all hogwash? lol Actually 
they will 
drink,  but it is the conditioned mind that is doing the drinking. Lol What 
did  they expect? Alice Leighton Cleaver had quite a bit ti say about the  
esoteric chosen ones. So did Blavatsky about the 12 peopole she chose and  
that 
the Mahatma's after a carefull over looking approved, needless to say  the 
conditioned mind was also in charge the same as the others , with the  same 
results. 
Read, I recommend: 

A Short History of The  Theosophical Society - 1875 - 1937 
by Josephine Ransom 
with preface by  
G. S. Arundale P.T.S. 
1938 
Theosophical Publishing House - Adyar,  Madras, India 

I read this when I first became interested in Madame  Blavatsky and the 
Theosophical Society. What was most inspiring to me was  the "service to 
others" performed in India of the Society by means of the  schools, 
nurserys, 
hospitals, clinics, training, drives for clothes,  shoes, food , and many 
other 
necessity's for the poor of india and  orphanaged children. I don't think 
an 
esoteric section made beans in  regards to those selfless actions. 
Josephine Ransoms Book was enthralling  to me and she didn't promise 
utopias. But 
she laid out in splendid array  how the Society changed lives in the most 
direct meaningful approaches.  Something that others in the world were 
doing for 
centuries before the  Theosophical Society was formed in New York in 1875. 

The buck stops  with the "conditioned mind of all mankind" our solitary 
universal common  villain and impediment in our travail during our samsaric 
journey.  

Bill Gates just donated Billions to advance vaccine research that can  save 
millions of lives and lifetimes of suffering and he probably never  read a 
single page of the S.D.. His story is retold a hundred times over  across 
the world by the compassion and philanthropy of many very wealthy  
individuals 
and/or corporations. The Shriners built a Pediatric Hospital  within a 
couple miles of me to treat children, the very best facilities in  the 
world, 
costing many tens of millions of charitable dollars are there  and they 
changed the lives of tens of thousands of children even in spite  of the 
fact that 
the Shriners are part of an organization you vilify while  totally ignoring 
the selfless good works they perform. 

Also the  Cathoilic Church performs acts of charity and help and outreach 
all over  the world to the needy in scores of ways inspite of your 
willingness to  vilify them. 

If one were to measure the real worlds accounting of good  selfless charity 
to others by non-Theosophical organizations the  conclusion must be that 
the world wide Theosophical Society in it's  miniscule population of much 
less 
than 100,000 registered members sincere  credible selfless goodworks 
accounts to lees than a pimple on a mosquitos  derriere. I_ think it's safe 
to say 
if one actully confronts the real  world in it's non-fantasized reality_. 

Not intended to offend anyone  accept my apoligy in advance. 
John 

----- Original Message -----  
From: "Cass Silva" < 

_ ( _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _http://www.charleschttp://www.c_ 
(http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _ ) _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
__silva_cass@_silva_ca_ (mailto:_silva_cass@yahoo.sil) _ _ 
(mailto: _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _silva_cass@yahoo.sil_ 
(mailto:silva_cass@yahoo.com) _ ) _> 
To: _ ( _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
_http://www.charleschttp://www.c_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _ )  _theos-talk@ )  _theos- ) 
(mailto: _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _theos-talk@yahoogrotheos-t_ 
(mailto:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com)  ) 
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010  3:50:50 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
Subject: Re: Theos-World Bring the  Theosophical Society back to its 
original lines! 

Morten, 
Look  what happened - those that joined the esoteric group soon began to 
have  their own ideas - and hence the breakaway. Theosophy in its infancy 
needed  to be spread to the wider community, one could only do that by 
introducing  an esoteric section that delved into the deep and hidden 
teachings. As I  
said it seemed as though some of those students began to think that they  
knew more than their teachers and the inevitable outcome of that was that  
theosophy became diluted or altered which would have defeated the purpose  
of 
the esoteric section. As they say, a little knowledge in the wrong  hands! 
. 

Perhaps they learnt that the theosophical message challenged  their own 
personal beliefs, and rather than change those beliefs, twisted  them to 
fit in 
or be accomodated by their own personal belief system. You  can take a 
hors_e to water, bu_t you can't make it drink, as they say.  

Cass 

> 
>From: Morten Nymann Olesen < _ ( _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
_http://www.charleschttp://www.c_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _ )  
_global-theosophy@_global-theosophy@<WBR_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
_global-theosophy@global-thgl_ (mailto:global-theosophy@stofanet.dk) _ ) _ 
> 
>To: _ ( _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
_http://www.charleschttp://www.c_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _ )  _theos-talk@ )  _theos- ) 
(mailto: _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _theos-talk@yahoogrotheos-t_ 
(mailto:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com)  ) 
>Sent: Sat, 13 February, 2010  3:53:38 AM 
>Subject: Re: Theos-World Bring the Theosophical Society  back to its 
original lines! 
> 
> 
>Dear Cass and  friends 
> 
>I hold your view to be against the esoterical  theosophical teachings - 
and so does H. P. Blavatsky in her Esoteric  papers as far as I can tell. 
>The Masters have had groups for many  years where they only allow certain 
members to participate.  
>Various Chelas have also had groups where only certain members are  
allowed. 
> 
>Are you saying that H. P. Blavatsky was wrong  when she and the others 
kicked Charles Sotheran out of the Theosophical  Society? 
>Are you also saying that H. P. Blavatsky was wrong when she  kicked Mabel 
Collins out of her Esoteric Section and refused to accept  everyone in her 
Esoteric Section? 
> 
>Let me seek to explain  why... 
> 
>1. 
>H. P. Blavatsky said in her Esoteric  Section papers: 
>"Having omitted, however, the usual precautions of the  probationary 
period, I have but myself to thank; and therefore, it is but  just that I 
should 
also be myself the first to suffer for it at the hands  of the inexorable 
Karmic law. For this, ironclad as I have been made by  daily and almost 
hourly 
unjust attacks, I would have cared but very  little; but that which I 
deplore the mostââwith a bitterness few of you  will ever realizeââis the 
fact 
that such a number of thoroughly earnest,  good, and sincere men and women 
should be made to suffer for the guilt of  the few. For, though but a fault 
of omission on my part, still that guilt,  as I feel, is due to my neglect. 
Behold! my Karma appeared as a warning  almost from the beginning of the 
E.S." 
>... 
>"I had started  well. Several of those whom I knew to be entirely unfitted 
to take the  pledge have been refused from the first; but I proved unable 
to withstand  their prayers when certain of them declared to me that it was 
their âlast  chance in life.â The âpledge feverâ made short work of their 
promises. One  broke her vows only four days after signing her pledge, 
becoming guilty of  the blackest treachery and disloyalty to her HIGHER 
SELF. And 
when I could  no longer keep in the E.S. either herself or her friend, the 
two convulsed  the whole Society with their calumnies and falsehoods. Then 
it 
was that  the old wondering query, âHow is it that âpoor H.P.B.,â 
notwithstanding  the Masters at her back, and her own insight, is so 
evidently 
unable to  know her friends from her foes?â ran once more the round of 
theosophical  circles, both here and in America. 
>Brothers, if you will judge from  appearances, and from the worldly 
standpoint, you are right; but if you  take the trouble of looking into the 
inner 
causes producing outward  results, you will find that you are decidedly in 
the wrong. That you  should no longer do me injustice, let me explain what 
I 
mean."  
>....... 
>"[And now I sincerely hope that you willââsome of you,  at leastââlearn 
a lesson from my weakness, and show your appreciation of  this by not 
judging me too unkindly if I now change somewhat my policy.  For I have to 
either 
do so, or to drop the Esoteric teachings altogether,  for those at any 
rate, 
who will disagree with this arrangement. To avoid  repeating the mistake, 
this is what I propose doing. Each Paper will be  sent as it was hitherto, 
only it will appear as a Supplement to the Ethics  and teachings which will 
impart the rules of Discipline and the laws of  Discipleship, as in the 
case 
of all Probationers. ] Those who accept the  new arrangement will have to 
study the latter, or they cannot receive any  more teachings from me. For, 
as 
saith the Book of Discipline in the  Schools of Dzyan: 
> 
>âSpeak not the mysteries to the common  vulgar, nor to the casual friend, 
or new disciple. With prudent eye to the  possible consequences, keep 
locked 
within your breast the teachings  received, until you find a listener who 
will understand your words and  sympathize with your aspirations.â 
>This does not mean that you are at  libert_y to repeat what you have 
learned to anyone whom _you believe to  answer that description, but that 
you can 
exchange views with your  co-disciples who are pledged as you are 
yourself." 
> _ ( _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _http://www.charleschttp://www.c_ 
(http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _ ) _ _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
_http://www.katinkahh_ (http://www.katinkah_/) _ 
( _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _http://www.katinkahh_ 
(http://www.katinkah/)  ) esselink. net/blavatsky/ articles/  v12/y1890_ 055.htm 
> 
>2. 
>H. P. Blavatsky said in her  Esoteric Section papers: 
>"The Masters can give but little assistance  to a Body not thoroughly 
united in purpose and feeling, and which breaks  its first fundamental rule
ââ 
universal brotherly love, without distinction  of race, creed or colour; 
nor 
to a Society, many members of which pass  their lives in judging, 
condemning, 
and often reviling other members in a  most untheosophical, not to say 
disgraceful, manner. 
>For this  reason it is now contemplated to gather the âelectâ of the T.S. 
and to  call them to action. It is only by a select group of brave souls, a 
 
handful of determined men and women hungry for genuine spiritual  
development and the acquirement of soul-wisdom, that the Theosophical  
Society at 
large can be brought back to its original lines. It is through  an Esoteric 
Section aloneââi.e., a group in which all the members, even if  
unacquainted 
with one another, work for each other, and by working for all  work for 
themselvesââthat the great Exoteric Society may be redeemed and  made to 
realize 
that in union and harmony alone lie its strength and  power. The object of 
this Section, then, is to help the future growth of  the Theosophical 
Society as a whole in the true direction, by promoting  brotherly union at 
least 
among the few." 
>....... 
>"As to  the relations of the Masters to this Section, it may be further 
said,  paradoxically, that with Them everything is possible and everything  
impossible. They may or may not communicate personally on the outer plane  
with 
a member, and those who are continually wishing to receive âordersâ  or 
communications directly from Them on this plane, either phenomenally or  
otherwise, will in all probability be disappointed. The Masters have no  
desire 
to prove Their power or give âtestsâ to anyone whatever. And the  fact 
that 
a member has concluded that a crisis of some kind or other is at  hand, 
when, according t_o his wise opinion, the Mast_er or Masters ought to  
speak and 
interfere personally, is no sound reason for such an outward  interference. 
" 
> _ ( _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _http://www.charleschttp://www.c_ 
(http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _ ) _ _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
_http://www.katinkahh_ (http://www.katinkah_/) _ 
( _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _http://www.katinkahh_ (http://www.kat
inkah/) _ ) _ esselink. net/blavatsky/ articles/  v12/y1890_ 052.htm 
> 
>3. 
>H. P. Blavatsky said in her  Esoteric Section papers: 
>"NOTICE 
>Members of the E.S.T.  receiving this Instruction will understand from its 
receipt that they have  passed out of the First Probationary Degree of the 
E. S. T. into the  Second Probationary Degree. The students in the Second 
Degree must not  discuss this Instruction with anyone still in the First 
Degree; they must  remain absolutely silent upon it, except to such persons 
as 
may be  notified to them as belonging to the Second or Third Degrees by 
Annie  
Besant or William Q. Judge. Any breach of this rule of silence will be an  
absolute bar to receiving any further Instructions. " 
> _ ( _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _http://www.charleschttp://www.c_ 
(http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _ ) _ _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
_http://www.katinkahh_ (http://www.katinkah_/) _ 
( _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _http://www.katinkahh_ 
(http://www.katinkah/)  ) esselink. net/blavatsky/ articles/  v12/y1890_ 057.htm 
> 
>Do you think that the Masters would reveal  all their teachings to the 
vulgar when in a group among the chelas?  
> 
>M. Sufilight 
> 
>----- Original Message -----  
>From: Cass Silva 
>To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
>Sent:  Friday, February 12, 2010 1:13 AM 
>Subject: Re: Theos-World Bring the  Theosophical Society back to its 
original lines! 
> 
>No, on  the contrary Morten, I don't believe in any elite group being set 
up  within an organization as this promotes division of its members into 
the  
'blessed' and the 'unclean'. I have no problem with study groups formed  
around esoteric ideas but these should be open to all. 
>  
>Cass 
> 
>> 
>>From: Morten Nymann Olesen  <global-theosophy@ stofanet. dk> 
>>To: theos-talk@yahoogro  ups.com 
>>Sent: Fri, 12 February, 2010 3:02:36 AM  
>>Subject: Re: Theos-World Bring the Theosophical Society back to  its 
original lines! 
>> 
>> 
>>Dear Cass  
>> 
>>My views are: 
>> 
>>So you agree  with me, that a secretive Esoteric Group, which requires 
approval before  membership or opportunity to be taught is achived, might 
be a 
helpful  idea? 
>> 
>>Some might consider the Secret Dcotrine to be a  Bible. I would however 
say, that it is quite false to compare them to have  anything in common 
since 
the Bible is turned into something infallible,  whereas the Secret Doctrine 
never have claimed to be infallible or to be a  Bible of any dead-letter or 
narrowminded dogmatic and fanatical  interpretation. 
>> 
>>As I see it, we also have to keep the  following in mind... 
>> 
>>The compassionate theosophist  and the Sufi operates through the use of 
DESIGNs and MEASURINGs. Each  teaching, book, lecture, e-mail etc. etc. is 
a 
DESIGN. After such a DESIGN  has been presented, to the receiver(s) of it, 
the message, reacts on the  individual in various ways. Depending on the 
reaction and the impact the  message has or have - the Initiate or 
Initiates 
MEASURES the receiver(s).  After a while a new DESIGN will be presented, 
maybe 
by another person or  by other means. This teaching about DESIGN and 
MEASURING is ages old. HPB  talked a bit about it. The Sufis are called the 
Designers, and sometimes  also masons, i.e. the Eastern compassionate 
masons. 
>>  
>>Taken from A CURRICULUM OF A SCHOOL 
>>"Man has few  alternatives in his search for truth. He may rely upon his 
>>unaided  intellect, and gamble that he is capable of perceiving truth or 
even  
>>the way to truth. This is a poor, but an attractive, gamble. Or he  can 
>>gamble upon the claims of an individual or institution which  claims to 
have 
>>such a way. This gamble, too, is a poor one.  Aside from a very few, 
wo/men 
>>in general lack a sufficiently  developed perception to tell them:" 
>> 
>>1. Not to trust  their own unaided mentation; 
>> 
>>2. Who or what to trust.  
>> 
>>"There are, in consequence, two main schools of  thought in this matter. 
Some 
>>say 'Follow your own promptings';  the other says: 'Trust this or that  
>>intuition'intuition'<WBR>. Each is really useless  to the ordinary 
wo/man. 

>>him use up his time." 
>>  
>>"The bitter truth is that before man can know his own inadequacy,  or the 

>>competence of another man or institution, he must first  learn something 
>>which will enable him to perceive both. Note well  that his perception 
itself 
>>is a product of right study; not of  instinct or emotional attraction to 
the 
>>individual, nor yet of  desiring to 'go it alone'. This is 'Learning How 
To 
>>Learn."  
>> 
>>"All this means, of course, that we are postulating  here the need for 
>>preparatory study before school work takes  place. We deny that a man can 
>>study and properly benefit from  school work until he is equipped for it: 
any 
>>more than a  person can study space-navigation unless he has a grasp of  
>>mathematics. " 
>> 
>>"This is not to say that a  man (or a woman) cannot have a sensation of 
>>truth. But the  unorganized and fragmented mind which is most people's 
>>heritage  tends to distort the quality and quantity of this sensation,  
>>leading to almost completely false conclusions about what can or  should 
be 
>>done." 
>> 
>>"This is not to say,  either, that man cannot take part in studies and 
>>activities which  impinge upon that portion of him which is connected 
with a  
>>higher life and cognition. But the mere application of special  
techniques 
>>[often to everyone, regardless of their current  state and requirements] 
will 
>>not transform that man's  consciousness. It will only feed into, and 
>>disturb, more or less  permanently, centers of thought and feeling where 
it 
>>does not  belong. Thus it is that something which should be a blessing  
>>becomes a curse. Sugar, shall we say, for a normal person is  
nutritionally 
>>useful. To a diabetic, it can be poison."  
>> 
>>"Therefore, before the techniques of study and  development are made 
>>available to the student, he must be enabled  to profit by them in the 
>>direction in which they are supposed to  lead, not in short-term 
indulgence." 
>> 
>>"Thus our  curriculum takes two parts: the first is in the providing of  
>>materials of a preparatory nature, in order to equip the  individual to 
>>become a student. The second is the development  itself." 
>> 
>>"If we, or anybody else, supply such study  or preparatory material 
>>prematurely, it will only operate on a  lower level than it could. The 
result 
>>will be harmless at  best. At worst, it will condition, train, the mind 
of 
>>the  individual to think and behave in patterns which are nothing less 
than  
>>automatic. In this latter way one can make what seem to be  converts, 
>>unwittingly play upon emotions, on lesser desires and  the conditioning 
>>propensity; train people to loyalty to  individuals, found and maintain 
>>institutions which seem more or  less serious or constructive. But no 
real 
>>progress towards  knowledge of the human being and the other dimension in 
>>which he  partly lives will in fact be made... ... ...." 
>> 
>>Taken  partly from: "Learning How to Learn" by the Afghan sufi-author 
Idries  
>>Shah 
>> 
>>M. Sufilight 
>>  
>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>From: Cass Silva  
>>To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
>>Sent: Thursday,  February 11, 2010 2:00 AM 
>>Subject: Re: Theos-World Bring the  Theosophical Society back to its 
original lines! 
>>  
>>>From what HPB said, we are given only what we can absorb and  assimilate. 
No point in giving us esoteric knowledge that we are not ready  for. The 
Secret Doctrine is not unlike the Bible in that it was written  for both 
exoteric and esoteric students, so whatever level the reader is  at, it 
provides 
guidance. 
>> 
>>Cass 
>>  
>>Cass 
>> 
>>> 
>>>From: Morten  Nymann Olesen <global-theosophy@ stofanet. dk> 
>>>To:  theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com 
>>>Sent: Thu, 11 February, 2010  2:58:47 AM 
>>>Subject: Re: Theos-World Bring the Theosophical  Society back to its 
original lines! 
>>> 
>>>  
>>>Dear Cass and friends 
>>> 
>>>My  views are: 
>>> 
>>>A new Esoterical School might be  necessary or a good and compassionate. 
Remember that we emply agents in  various groups and organisations. But I 
find, that another Theosophical  Society following the original lines would 
be a much better idea, - well  provided that the present Theosophical 
Society 
is not able to show us that  they still follow the original lines given by 
the Masters, and why their  lines or program are better than the original 
one. 
>>>  
>>>Such a Knowledge is esoterical knowledge. And that kind of  Knowledge is 
not, (so I have been told here at Theos-talk), officially  claimed by the 
leaders Theosophical Society today. An example: Try to ask  the Master 
whether they consider their Himalayan group to be an elite  group. Do you 
think 
that the Masters Himalayan group will reveal all and  everything esoterical 
to 
everyone? 
>>> 
>>>M.  Sufilight 
>>> 
>>>----- Original Message -----  
>>>From: Cass Silva 
>>>To: theos-talk@yahoogro  ups.com 
>>>Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 11:54 PM  
>>>Subject: Re: Theos-World Bring the Theosophical Society back  to its 
original lines! 
>>> 
>>>I hope you are not  suggesting that new esoteric schools be formed? What 
knowledge is so  esoteric that it can now only be shared by an elite group? 
>>>  
>>>Cass 
>>> 
>>>>  
>>>>From: Morten Nymann Olesen <global-theosophy@ stofanet.  dk> 
>>>>To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com  
>>>>Sent: Wed, 10 February, 2010 6:18:19 AM  
>>>>Subject: Theos-World Bring the Theosophical Society back  to its 
original lines! 
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>>Dear friends 
>>>> 
>>>>My  views are: 
>>>> 
>>>>Sometimes one would do  well in reading the words given by H. P. 
Blavatsky  
>>>>about the reason for the formation of the Esoteric  Section... 
>>>> 
>>>>H. P. Blavatsky said to  the members of the Esoteric Section: 
>>>>"This degree of the  Esoteric Section is probationary, and its general 
purpose is to prepare  and fit the student for the study of practical 
occultism or Raj yoga.  Therefore, in this degree, the student--save in 
exceptional cases--will  not be taught how to produce physical phenomena, 
nor will any 
magical  powers be allowed to develop in him; nor, if possessing such 
powers  naturally, will he be permitted to exercise them before he has 
thoroughly  
mastered the knowledge of SELF, of the psycho-physiologica l processes  
(taking place on the occult plane) in the human body generally, and until  
he 
has in abeyance all his lower passions and his PERSONAL SELF.  
>>>>The real Head of the Esoteric Section is a Master, of whom  H. P. 
Blavatsky is the mouthpiece for this Section. He is one of those  Adepts 
referred 
to in theosophical literature, and concerned in the  formation of the 
Theosophical Society. " 
>>>>. . . . . . .  
>>>>"The Theosophical Society has just entered upon the  fourteenth year of 
its existence; and if it has accomplished great, one  may almost say 
stupendous, results on the exoteric and utilitarian plane,  it has proved a 
dead 
failure on all those points which rank foremost among  the objects of its 
original establishment. Thus, as a "Universal  Brotherhood, " or even as a 
fraternity, one among many, it has descended  to the level of all those 
Societies whose pretensions are great, but whose  names are simply 
masks,--nay, even 
SHAMS. Nor can the excuse be pleaded  that it was led into such an 
undignified course owing to its having been  
>>>>impeded in its natural development, and almost  extinguished, by reason 
of the conspiracies of its enemies openly begun in  1884. Because even 
before that date there never was that solidarity in the  ranks of our 
Society 
which would not only enable it to resist all external  attacks, but also 
make 
it possible for greater, wider, and more tangible  help to be given to all 
its members by those who are always ready to give  help when we are fit to 
receive it. When trouble arose, too many were  quick to doubt and despair, 
and 
few indeed were they who had worked for  the Cause and not for themselves. 
The attacks of the enemy have given the  Society some discretion in the 
conduct of its external progress, but its  real internal condition has not 
improved, and the members, in their  efforts towards spiritual culture, 
still 
require that help which  solidarity in the ranks can alone give them the 
right 
to ask. The Masters  can give but little assistance to a Body not 
>>>thoroughly united  in purpose and feeling, and which breaks its first 
fundamental  rule--universal brotherly love, without distinction of race, 
creed or  colour; nor to a Society, many members of which pass their lives 
in  
judging, condemning, and often reviling other members in a most  
untheosophical, not to say disgraceful, manner." 
>>>>. . .  . . . . 
>>>>"For this reason it is now contemplated to gather  the "elect" of the 
T.S. and to call them to action. It is only by a select  group of brave 
souls, a handful of determined men and women hungry for  genuine spiritual 
development and the acquirement of soul-wisdom, that the  Theosophical 
Society at 
large can be brought back to its original lines.  It is through an Esoteric 
Section alone--i.e., a group in which all the  members, even if 
unacquainted 
with one another, work for each other, and  by working for all work for 
themselves-- that the great Exoteric Society  may be redeemed and made to 
realize that in union and harmony alone lie  its strength and power. The 
object 
of this Section, then, is to help the  future growth of the Theosophical 
Society as a whole in the true  direction, by promoting brotherly union at 
least 
among the few.  
>>>>All know that this end was in view when the Society was  established, 
and even in its mere unpledged ranks there was a possibility  for 
development 
and knowledge, until it began to show want of real union;  and now it must 
be saved from future dangers by the united aim, brotherly  feeling, and 
constant exertions of the members of this Esoteric Section.  Therefore, 
anyone 
who has signed the pledge without realizing this is  earnestly recommended 
to 
reconsider his position, and to withdraw unless  he is prepared to devote 
himself t_o the carrying out of this purpose. Once  offered the grand 
example 
of practical altruism, of the noble lives of  those who le_arn to master 
the 
great knowledge but to help others, and who  strive to acquire powers but 
to place them at the service of their  fellow-men, the whole theosophical 
community may yet be steered into  action, and led to follow the example 
set 
before them.  
>>>>The Esoteric Section is thus "set apart" for the salvation  of the 
whole Society, and its course from its first steps will be an  arduous and 
uphill work for its members, though a great reward lies behind  the many 
obstacles once they are overcome. 
>>>> _ ( _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
_http://www.charleschttp://www.c_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _ ) _ _ 
(http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _http://www.katinkahh_ (http://www.katinkah_/) _ 
( _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _http://www.katinkahh_ 
(http://www.katinkah/)  ) esselink. net/blavatsky/ articles/  v7/yxxxx_ 019.htm 
>>>> 
>>>>M. Sufilight asks  and comments: 
>>>>I ask your compassionate hearts as honest  Seekers after Truth : 
>>>> 
>>>>Do you my dear  readers understand that, the Esoteric Section was 
according to H. P.  Blavatsky created in 1888 so that "the Theosophical 
Society 
at large can  be brought back to its original lines"; the lines openly 
deviated from in  1884? 
>>>> 
>>>>Did this imply turning it  towards a more or less blurred or openly 
declared political involvement à la A. O. Hume - National Congress of 
India? I 
would clearly say no, and no  a thousand times! 
>>>> 
>>>>Did this imply  asserting a Messiah in the flesh as the World Teacher 
of the Age (The  Maitreya) as a dogma or propagandized doctrine to follow? 
I 
would clearly  say no, and no a thousand times! 
>>>> 
>>>>Did  this imply rejecting the view that "No Theosophist should be 
silent when  he hears evil reports or slanders spread about the Society, or 
innocent  persons, wheth_er they be h_is colleagues or outsiders. " (The 
Key to 
the  Theosophist, 2ed., 1890, p. 250)? I would clearly say no, and no a  
thousand times! 
>>>> 
>>>>Did it only imply  this with reagard to physically present humans or 
did it also imply it  with regard deceased ones? I would clearly say both 
issues count, because  people not living in the physical are present in our 
universe!  
>>>> 
>>>>M. Sufilight 
>>>>  
>>>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>> 
>>>Send instant messages to your online friends  _ 
( _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _http://www.charleschttp://www.c_ 
(http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _ ) _ _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 
_http://au.messengerh_ (http://au.messenger_/) _ ( _ 
(http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _http://au.messengerh_ (http://au.messenger/) _ ) _ .yahoo.com 
>>>  
>>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]  
>>> 
>>>[Non-text portions of this message have been  removed] 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>  
>>____________________<WBR>_ _ _________ _________  _________ _________ 
>>Yahoo!7: Catch-up on your favourite Channel 7  TV shows easily, legally, 
and for free at PLUS7. www.tv.yahoo.  com.au/plus7 
>> 
>>[Non-text portions of this message have  been removed] 
>> 
>>[Non-text portions of this message have  been removed] 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>  
>______________________<WBR>_ _________ _________  _________ ______ 
>Yahoo!7: Catch-up on your favourite Channel 7 TV  shows easily, legally, 
and for free at PLUS7. www.tv.yahoo. com.au/plus7  
> 
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]  
> 
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]  
> 
> 
> 

[Non-text portions of this message have  been removed] 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]  

_ ( _ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _http://www.charleschttp://www.c_ 
(http://www.charlescosimano.com/) _ ) 

[Non-text portions of this  message have been removed] 

[Non-text portions of this message have  been removed]

_ (http://www.charlescosimano.com/) 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application