Theos-Talk Archives (September 2010 Message tt00040)

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "esapress@..." <esapress@...> wrote:
>
> I continue to think that a real Theory of Everything will naturally arise once man has more than a cateogory header, a true meaning a/o definition/understanding, of time-space - and that isn't as easy for him as he thinks right now because while it may be a natural addition, time-space is in and of itself, as a subcategory, of a different sort than say length, wideth, so on.
> 
> For example try something like this; length, height, days.
> 
> In this/that respect adding time-space really means first acurately defining what time-space is and how these two subcategories or system sets align a/o overlap, as well as any other relative assocs, in particular, for time-space itself.
> 
> Right now, as I see it, it looks to me like man has the category headers, time-space, however he is, at the moment, still very much in process of actually aquiring real (aka 'working') definitions.
> 
> I kind of look at it like this; If you don't know how a radiator works it might be quite easy to speculate that you could fit a radiator into a blueprint of/for a car (and any number of various designs/cars) any number of ways, however once you know how a radiator works it's kind of obvious what it is, how it works, and where it does/does not go.
> 
> http://www.esapress.com/
>


Actually, I just had a look at my site, the math section in particular, and noticed that some of my diagrams and number columns are now suddenly wacky, dunno why, guess I'll have to look and see if I've been hacked - hardly matters a/b worth noting I think.