Theos-Talk Archives (March 2003 Message tt00397)

this is a bunch of bullshit. see you all later.



--- leonmaurer@aol.com wrote:
> mail@katinkahesselink.net writes:
> 
> Hi Leon,
> 
> Some comments below. 
> 
> > Leon:
> 
> > We can only speak of the Cosmos (Brahma), which
> can be 
> 
> > unconditioned (when asleep) and conditioned (when
> awake). 
> > The Absolute reality, rootless root, (Parabrahm)
> or Krishna, 
> 
> > is neither conditioned nor unconditioned, but
> always is 
> 
> > Absolute and ineffable. Yet, while they are all
> part of the one 
> 
> > reality, they are different in their state or
> circumstance of existence. 
> 
> > Remember, The Absolute is the Father of
> innumerable universes, 
> 
> > and no matter how many of them are either in
> conditioned or 
> 
> > unconditioned states of existence, Parabrahm or
> Ein Soph is forever 
> > unchanged. Admittedly, that cannot be "sensed"
> since it is beyond all 
> 
> > finite conception. However, the unconditioned
> Cosmos (Brahma) can 
> 
> > only be "sensed" by the "open eye of the Dagma"
> when it manifests 
> 
> > or becomes conditioned. (Ref: Stanzas I-II)
> 
> 
> > So, if you are interested in visualizing these
> relationships, I 
> 
> > suggest you study the diagrams at:
> 
> >
>
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/invlutionflddiagnotate.gif
> 
> >
>
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/Invlutionfldmirror2.gif
> 
> [Katinka] 
> I like these two pictures. The first seems to me
> more consistent with 
> 
> the fractal idea. To make the latter consistent
> every circle would 
> 
> need to be filled with more circles - which would
> take all the beauty 
> 
> out of it. (the mathematician in me speaking). 
> 
> Can you give a link to the page where you explain
> those diagrams?
> 
> [Leon] 
> Thank you. The first "notate" diagram only
> represents the "light" fields that 
> we can experience in our phenomenal universe (as
> spoken about in the 
> Stanzas). However, the second diagram goes a bit
> deeper and explores the 
> possibility that there is a dark universe that is
> the exact reflection of 
> this one where the force is spinning in the opposite
> direction. This came 
> out of my scientific background that insists that
> there must be a fundamental 
> "symmetry" in the Absolute that underlies and
> balances all manifestations of 
> conditioned reality. 
> 
> Thus, the primal force, besides being attractive and
> repulsive, is also 
> positive and negative, light and dark, etc. Didn't
> HPB say that everything 
> is fundamentally "electrical" in nature, and that
> there were additional 
> fields of different or denser matter that are beyond
> our ability to 
> understand? These dark fields could be the "halls of
> Amenti" or "nether 
> worlds" spoken of in ancient Egyptian and
> kabbalistic metaphysics... And, 
> also, the "dark matter" or "antimatter" that come up
> in the cosmological 
> field equations of modern science. 
> 
> Thus, in the "mirror" diagram, I consider that the
> "dark" force or energy is 
> spinning counterclockwise to the direction of spin
> in this "light" universe. 
> (Note the gray and blue arrows that indicate this.) 
> Actually, both the light 
> and dark universe would actually be in the same
> place. So, to really 
> visualize this as a cross sectional diagram of
> spherical fields that are 
> coadunate, all we have to do is print out and fold
> the mirror diagram on its 
> central horizontal line and then see the two field
> cross sections back to 
> back and note that they are coadunate, and spinning
> in opposite directions.
> 
> The only web page that even begins to explain the
> origin of the field 
> diagrams is where I show how the first monadic field
> starts from the central 
> zero point and proceeds to emanate the ray
> centrifugally outwardly, and then 
> spirals back centripetally, and out again, in three
> cycles, to form the first 
> triune fields or primal monad. This implies (as HPB
> said) that the primal 
> force underlying gravity is both attractive and
> repulsive. Therefore, 
> "everything that goes around comes around" or what
> goes out must come back 
> in. That, of course is the fundamental basis of
> karma, as well as cycles and 
> periodicity. See:
>
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield.html#ancho
> 
> r1341429 (Or, you can go to the . .
> ./chakrafield.html -- and scroll down to 
> the 3 cycle diagram.)
> 
> This triple cycle keeps endlessly repeating, and as
> the zero point also spins 
> on its vertical axis, the lines of energy spiral
> inward and outward 
> vortically and (so to speak) weave three spherical
> fields, like bubbles 
> within a bubble... With their inside and outside
> circumferences connected 
> through their 3 crossover (zero) points. 
> Topologically this is like a Klien 
> bottle or a Mobius strip created from a single
> endless "ray," "line," or 
> "string" of force. This is the fundamental
> coenergetic form of all monads 
> (multidimensional triune fields) on whatever level
> of involution they appear. 
> Incidentally, the wave front of a fundamental
> photon particle on the 
> physical plane has this exact form (like a figure
> eight inscribed inside a 
> circle) -- which, because it is spinning
> perpendicular to its direction of 
> propogation, accounts for the multiple axis
> polarization of sidereal light.
> 
> This formation is entirely in conformance with the
> most advanced Superstring 
> and M-brane theory's fractal and topological
> mathematics (although I don't 
> understand one bit of it :-) -- that, postulates a
> ten (or more) dimensional 
> universe consisting of 3-directional hyperspace
> fields within fields within 
> fields, etc. -- which form their circumferential
> "membranes" out of parallel 
> "strings" of primal force. 
> 
> Thus, this fractal progression of the lower
> mind-matter fields of each monad, 
> continues indefinitely, down to the smallest
> particle (light) of our 
> phenomenal universe -- with each particle having an
> analogous and 
> corresponding seven fold nature. But this, too, is
> only an "ideal" model of 
> the "beginning," And, it goes much deeper when we
> begin to consider when and 
> how the "symmetry" breaks, and all the myriad forms
> of Nature begin to 
> "precipitate" out of the seven fold fields of
> consciousness on each plane 
> until they reach the physical plane. But, this is a
> mystery that can only be 
> comprehended intuitively on the highest planes of
> one's inner nature. 
> (Although, I found it more or less clearly
> explained, symbolically, in the 
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com